Neural adaptation in pSTS correlates with perceptual aftereffects to biological motion and with autistic traits

The adaptive nature of biological motion perception has been documented in behavioral studies, with research showing that prolonged viewing of an action can bias judgments of subsequent actions towards the opposite of its attributes. However, the neural mechanisms underlying action adaptation aftereffects remain unknown. We examined adaptation-induced changes in brain responses to an ambiguous action after adapting to walking or running actions within two bilateral regions of interest: 1) human middle temporal area (hMT+), a lower-level motion-sensitive region of cortex, and 2) posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), a higher-level action-selective area. We found a significant correlation between neural adaptation strength in right pSTS and perceptual aftereffects to biological motion measured behaviorally, but not in hMT+. The magnitude of neural adaptation in right pSTS was also strongly correlated with individual differences in the degree of autistic traits. Participants with more autistic traits exhibited less adaptation-induced modulations of brain responses in right pSTS and correspondingly weaker perceptual aftereffects. These results suggest a direct link between perceptual aftereffects and adaptation of neural populations in right pSTS after prolonged viewing of a biological motion stimulus, and highlight the potential importance of this brain region for understanding differences in social-cognitive processing along the autistic spectrum.

[1]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Adaptation to biological motion leads to a motion and a form aftereffect , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  N. Sadato,et al.  Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Peter Neri,et al.  Action Perception Is Intact in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Bayesian integration of position and orientation cues in perception of biological and non-biological forms , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Phil McAleer,et al.  Intention Perception in High Functioning People with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Animacy Displays Derived from Human Actions , 2011, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[7]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Not one extrastriate body area: Using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Mirella Dapretto,et al.  Intact recognition, but attenuated adaptation, for biological motion in youth with autism spectrum disorder , 2016, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[11]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  John A. Pyles,et al.  Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’ , 2007, Vision Research.

[14]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Disrupted Action Perception in Autism: Behavioral Evidence, Neuroendophenotypes, and Diagnostic Utility , 2022 .

[15]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  A. Saygin Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Signature Movements Lead to Efficient Search for Threatening Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  Unaffected Perceptual Thresholds for Biological and Non-Biological Form-from-Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Conditions , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  John T. Serences,et al.  A comparison of methods for characterizing the event-related BOLD timeseries in rapid fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Li Su,et al.  A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  No evidence for impaired perception of biological motion in adults with autistic spectrum disorders , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[26]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Abnormal Adaptive Face-Coding Mechanisms in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects , 2007, Vision Research.

[29]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Mirror neurons in monkey area F5 do not adapt to the observation of repeated actions , 2013, Nature Communications.

[30]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Impaired Global, and Compensatory Local, Biological Motion Processing in People with High Levels of Autistic Traits , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[31]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FITTING THE MIND TO THE WORLD: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects , 2022 .

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  M. Giese,et al.  Visual Learning Shapes the Processing of Complex Movement Stimuli in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[36]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  A biological motion toolbox for reading, displaying, and manipulating motion capture data in research settings. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[39]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[40]  John A. Pyles,et al.  fMR-Adaptation Reveals Invariant Coding of Biological Motion on the Human STS , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation and the Phenomenology of Perception , 2005 .

[43]  M. Pavlova Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[45]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Morphable Models for the Analysis and Synthesis of Complex Motion Patterns , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[46]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Dissociating the neural bases of repetition-priming and adaptation in the human brain for faces. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Masaaki Kawahashi,et al.  Renovation of Journal of Visualization , 2010, J. Vis..

[48]  J. Lange,et al.  A Model of Biological Motion Perception from Configural Form Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Orban,et al.  Specificity of regions processing biological motion , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[50]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[53]  Fang Fang,et al.  Misbinding of Color and Motion in Human Visual Cortex , 2014, Current Biology.

[54]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[56]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[57]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Perception of biological motion in autism spectrum disorders , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Physical and Biological Constraints Govern Perceived Animacy of Scrambled Human Forms , 2013, Psychological science.

[59]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Neural Integration of Information Specifying Human Structure from Form, Motion, and Depth , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Perception of Social Interactions for Spatially Scrambled Biological Motion , 2014, PloS one.

[61]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: Dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[62]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Wendy Baccus,et al.  Form and motion make independent contributions to the response to biological motion in occipitotemporal cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[64]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[65]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[66]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[67]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Do distinct atypical cortical networks process biological motion information in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[68]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Neural Substrates for Action Understanding at Different Description Levels in the Human Brain , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[70]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes Monkey and Human fMRI Studies , 2003, Neuron.

[71]  A. Klin,et al.  Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion , 2009, Nature.

[72]  F. Fang,et al.  Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[73]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[75]  M. Webster Adaptation and visual coding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[76]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[77]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The role of MT+/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study , 2007 .