Use of Sub-Ensembles and Multi-Template Observers to Evaluate Detection Task Performance for Data That are Not Multivariate Normal

The Hotelling Observer (HO) is widely used to evaluate image quality in medical imaging. However, applying it to data that are not multivariate-normally (MVN) distributed is not optimal. In this paper, we apply two multi-template linear observer strategies to handle such data. First, the entire data ensemble is divided into sub-ensembles that are exactly or approximately MVN and homoscedastic. Next, a different linear observer template is estimated for and applied to each sub-ensemble. The first multi-template strategy, adapted from previous work, applies the HO to each sub-ensemble, calculates the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for each sub-ensemble, and averages the AUCs from all the sub-ensembles. The second strategy applies the Linear Discriminant (LD) to estimate test statistics for each sub-ensemble and calculates a single global AUC using the pooled test statistics from all the sub-ensembles. We show that this second strategy produces the maximum AUC when only shifting of the HO test statistics is allowed. We compared these strategies to the use of a single HO template for the entire data ensemble by applying them to the non-MVN data obtained from reconstructed images of a realistic simulated population of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies with the goal of optimizing the reconstruction parameters. Of the strategies investigated, the multi-template LD strategy yielded the highest AUC for any given set of reconstruction parameters. The optimal reconstruction parameters obtained by the two multi-template strategies were comparable and produced higher AUCs for each sub-ensemble than the single-template HO strategy.

[1]  H. Barrett,et al.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Factors affecting the normality of channel outputs of channelized model observers: an investigation using realistic myocardial perfusion SPECT images , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[3]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Bias in Hotelling observer performance computed from finite data , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Ideal-Observer Performance under Signal and Background Uncertainty , 2003, IPMI.

[5]  W P Segars,et al.  Fast modelling of the collimator–detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Miles N. Wernick,et al.  Optimization of iterative reconstructions of /sup 99m/Tc cardiac SPECT studies using numerical observers , 2001 .

[9]  Ilya Narsky,et al.  Statistical Analysis Techniques in Particle Physics , 2013 .

[10]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Ideal observers and optimal ROC hypersurfaces in N-class classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[12]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimization and comparison of simultaneous and separate acquisition protocols for dual isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  E. W. Ng,et al.  A table of integrals of the error functions. , 1969 .

[16]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimum compensation method and filter cutoff frequency in myocardial SPECT: a human observer study. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  The SimSET Program , 2012 .

[19]  G Gindi,et al.  A channelized Hotelling observer study of lesion detection in SPECT MAP reconstruction using anatomical priors. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Abhinav K Jha,et al.  A clustering algorithm for liver lesion segmentation of diffusion-weighted MR images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis & Interpretation (SSIAI).

[21]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  The Ideal Observer Objective Assessment Metric for Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Application to Signal Detection Tasks , 2011, IPMI.

[23]  H. Ozcelik,et al.  Correlation matrix distance, a meaningful measure for evaluation of non-stationary MIMO channels , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[24]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing and detecting low-pass filtered objects , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Mass detection on mammograms: influence of signal shape uncertainty on human and model observers. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Optimization of model observer performance for signal known exactly but variable tasks leads to optimized performance in signal known statistically tasks , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Michael Ghaly,et al.  Optimization of energy window and evaluation of scatter compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT using the ideal observer with and without model mismatch and an anthropomorphic model observer , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[28]  Marcos Dipinto,et al.  Discriminant analysis , 2020, Predictive Analytics.

[29]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[30]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  The effect of signal variability on the histograms of anthropomorphic channel outputs: factors resulting in non-normally distributed data , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[32]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Model mismatch and the ideal observer in SPECT , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[33]  B. Tsui,et al.  A new method for modeling the spatially-variant, object-dependent scatter response function in SPECT , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[34]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Model observers for signal-known-statistically tasks (SKS) , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[35]  Xin He,et al.  Toward Realistic and Practical Ideal Observer (IO) Estimation for the Optimization of Medical Imaging Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[37]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[38]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  An ideal-observer framework to investigate signal detectability in diffuse optical imaging. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[39]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  A mathematical observer study for the evaluation and optimization of compensation methods for myocardial SPECT using a phantom population that realistically models patient variability , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[40]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[41]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[42]  Michael Ghaly,et al.  Design of a digital phantom population for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging research , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[45]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[46]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.