Evidence of Multiple Treponema Phylotypes Involved in Bovine Digital Dermatitis as Shown by 16S rRNA Gene Analysis and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

ABSTRACT The etiopathogenesis of the skin disease digital dermatitis (DD), an important cause of lameness in cattle, remains uncertain. Microscopically, the disease appears to be polymicrobial, with spirochetes as the predominant bacteria. The objective of this study was to identify the main part of the bacteria involved in DD lesions of cattle by using culture-independent molecular methods. Ten different phylotypes of Treponema were identified either by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of bacteria from DD lesions or by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using phylotype-specific 16S rRNA-directed oligonucleotide probes. Two phylotypes, phylotype 1 (PT1) and PT2, were not closely related to any characterized treponemal species. PT7 was 99.3% identical to Treponema denticola, while PT9 resembled T. vincentii by 96%. The remaining phylotypes, PT3, PT4, PT5, PT6, and PT8, and Treponema brennaborense had previously been isolated from DD lesions. Forty DD biopsy specimens were examined for Treponema by FISH. With one exception, all of the biopsy specimens revealed epidermotropic, intermingled infection with three or more different phylotypes (mean, 4.7). The most prevalent species were PT1 (95%), PT6 (93%), and PT3 (85%). While colonization by PT3 was confined to the surface of the epidermis, both PT1 and PT6 invaded deep into the stratum spinosum and were seen in ulcerated dermal papillae. In two cases, all 10 phylotypes were demonstrated. Furthermore, FISH with a Treponema group-specific probe showed that Treponema accounted for more than 90% of the total bacterial population in the biopsy specimens. These data strongly suggest that a group of apparently symbiotic Treponema species are involved as primary bacterial pathogens in DD.

[1]  T. Jukes CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[2]  R. Zuerner,et al.  Papillomatous digital dermatitis spirochetes suppress the bovine macrophage innate immune response. , 2007, Veterinary microbiology.

[3]  A. Steiner,et al.  Quantitation of Guggenheimella bovis and treponemes in bovine tissues related to digital dermatitis. , 2007, FEMS microbiology letters.

[4]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  A. J. Jones,et al.  At Least 1 in 20 16S rRNA Sequence Records Currently Held in Public Repositories Is Estimated To Contain Substantial Anomalies , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  G. Armitage,et al.  Relationship between the percentage of subgingival spirochetes and the severity of periodontal disease. , 1982, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  U. Göbel,et al.  Spirochetes from digital dermatitis lesions in cattle are closely related to treponemes associated with human periodontitis. , 1997, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[8]  M. Wagner,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization shows spatial distribution of as yet uncultured treponemes in biopsies from digital dermatitis lesions. , 1998, Microbiology.

[9]  H. Munro,et al.  Mammalian protein metabolism , 1964 .

[10]  D. Read,et al.  Spirochetes isolated from dairy cattle with papillomatous digital dermatitis and interdigital dermatitis. , 1995, Veterinary microbiology.

[11]  U. Göbel,et al.  Involvement of Guggenheimella bovis in digital dermatitis lesions of dairy cows. , 2008, Veterinary microbiology.

[12]  W. C. Losinger Economic impacts of reduced milk production associated with papillomatous digital dermatitis in dairy cows in the USA , 2006, Journal of Dairy Research.

[13]  D. Lane 16S/23S rRNA sequencing , 1991 .

[14]  F. Dewhirst,et al.  Guggenheimella bovis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from lesions of bovine dermatitis digitalis. , 2005, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[15]  F. Dewhirst,et al.  Bacterial Diversity in Human Subgingival Plaque , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  R. Blowey,et al.  Serological evidence of spirochaetal infections associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. , 1999, Veterinary journal.

[17]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Immunopathological investigations on bovine digital epidermitis , 2005, Veterinary Record.

[18]  D. Downham,et al.  Some relationships between spirochaete infections and digital dermatitis in four UK dairy herds. , 2002, Research in veterinary science.

[19]  R. Ericson,et al.  The diversity of periodontal spirochetes by 16S rRNA analysis. , 2000, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[20]  M. Sela,et al.  Role of Treponema denticola in periodontal diseases. , 2001, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[21]  J. Fry,et al.  PRIMROSE: a computer program for generating and estimating the phylogenetic range of 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes and primers in conjunction with the RDP-II database. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  D A Stahl,et al.  Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  J. Goff,et al.  Characterization of Treponema phagedenis-Like Spirochetes Isolated from Papillomatous Digital Dermatitis Lesions in Dairy Cattle , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[24]  A. Edwards,et al.  From tooth to hoof: treponemes in tissue-destructive diseases. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[25]  R. Zuerner,et al.  Lesion Formation and Antibody Response Induced by Papillomatous Digital Dermatitis-Associated Spirochetes in a Murine Abscess Model , 2007, Infection and Immunity.

[26]  W. Klee,et al.  Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[27]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics , 1991 .

[28]  M. Boyé,et al.  Fusobacterium necrophorum determined as abortifacient in sheep by laser capture microdissection and fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2006, Molecular and cellular probes.

[29]  C. Hart,et al.  Characterization of a spirochaete isolated from a case of bovine digital dermatitis , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[30]  M. Woodward,et al.  Partial identification of spirochaetes from two dairy cows with digital dermatitis by polymerase chain reaction analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[31]  D. Read,et al.  Papillomatous Digital Dermatitis (Footwarts) in California Dairy Cattle: Clinical and Gross Pathologic Findings , 1998, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[32]  S. Goodison,et al.  16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  U. Göbel,et al.  Treponema brennaborense sp. nov., a novel spirochaete isolated from a dairy cow suffering from digital dermatitis. , 1999, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[34]  M. Woodward,et al.  The frequent detection of a treponeme in bovine digital dermatitis by immunocytochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. , 1998, Veterinary microbiology.

[35]  C. Hart,et al.  Isolation and cultivation of a spirochaete from bovine digital dermatitis , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[36]  N. Pace,et al.  Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  T. Marsh,et al.  Characterization of the predominant anaerobic bacterium recovered from digital dermatitis lesions in three Michigan dairy cows. , 2003, Anaerobe.

[38]  S. Jeffery Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1979 .

[39]  M. Woodward,et al.  Spirochaetes and other bacterial species associated with bovine digital dermatitis. , 1997, FEMS microbiology letters.

[40]  C. Hart,et al.  Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. , 2008, Veterinary microbiology.

[41]  C. Stephens Microbiology: Intimate strangers , 2000, Current Biology.