Causes of the reduction in uncertainty in the anthropogenic radiative forcing of climate between IPCC (2001) and IPCC (2007)

Mechanisms that drive climate change are quantified by the radiative forcing which is the perturbation to the global energy balance of the Earth/atmosphere system. These mechanisms may be of anthropogenic or natural origins and each has an associated level of scientific uncertainty. Until recently, even the sign of the anthropogenic radiative forcing has been in doubt because strong, poorly quantified negative radiative forcings such as those from aerosols act to oppose the strong, well quantified positive radiative forcings from well mixed greenhouse gases. We present an analysis of the probability distribution function of the anthropogenic radiative forcing for the individual forcing mechanisms identified by IPCC (2001) and IPCC (2007). We conclude that significant progress in reducing the uncertainty of the anthropogenic radiative forcing has been made since IPCC (2001). The single most important contributor to this conclusion appears to be the reduction in the uncertainty associated with the aerosol direct effect, followed by the provision of a best estimate for the aerosol cloud albedo indirect effect.

[1]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[2]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[3]  O. Boucher,et al.  Global estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  An “A-Train” Strategy for Quantifying Direct Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols , 2005 .

[5]  M. Chin,et al.  Aerosol anthropogenic component estimated from satellite data , 2005 .

[6]  D. Hauglustaine,et al.  Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere , 2005 .

[7]  B. Holben,et al.  Intercomparison of Satellite Retrieved Aerosol Optical Depth over the Ocean , 2004 .

[8]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[9]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[10]  J. Haywood,et al.  On summing the components of radiative forcing of climate change , 2001 .

[11]  M. Andreae,et al.  Uncertainty in Climate Change Caused by Aerosols , 1996, Science.

[12]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[13]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[14]  K. Shine,et al.  Intergovernmental panel on Climate change (IPCC),in encyclopedia of Enviroment and society,Vol.3 , 2007 .

[15]  J. Cozic,et al.  European Geosciences Union Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions , 2004 .