Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. II. Physiological evidence for interhemispheric transfer in area LIP of the split-brain macaque.

With each eye movement, a new image impinges on the retina, yet we do not notice any shift in visual perception. This perceptual stability indicates that the brain must be able to update visual representations to take our eye movements into account. Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) update visual representations when the eyes move. The circuitry that supports these updated representations remains unknown, however. In this experiment, we asked whether the forebrain commissures are necessary for updating in area LIP when stimulus representations must be updated from one visual hemifield to the other. We addressed this question by recording from LIP neurons in split-brain monkeys during two conditions: stimulus traces were updated either across or within hemifields. Our expectation was that across-hemifield updating activity in LIP would be reduced or abolished after transection of the forebrain commissures. Our principal finding is that LIP neurons can update stimulus traces from one hemifield to the other even in the absence of the forebrain commissures. This finding provides the first evidence that representations in parietal cortex can be updated without the use of direct cortico-cortical links. The second main finding is that updating activity in LIP is modified in the split-brain monkey: across-hemifield signals are reduced in magnitude and delayed in onset compared with within-hemifield signals, which indicates that the pathways for across-hemifield updating are less effective in the absence of the forebrain commissures. Together these findings reveal a dynamic circuit that contributes to updating spatial representations.

[1]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Contributions of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons , 1977, Brain Research.

[2]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[3]  J D Holtzman,et al.  Dissociation of spatial information for stimulus localization and the control of attention. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[5]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[6]  P. Grobstein Analysis of Visual Behavior, David J. Ingle, Melvyn A. Goodale, Richard J.W. Mansfield (Eds.). MIT press, Cambridge, MA and London (1982), 834 , 1983 .

[7]  Jeffrey D. Holtzman,et al.  Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: Evidence from human commissurotomy patients , 1984, Vision Research.

[8]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Orienting Attention across the Vertical Meridian: Evidence from Callosotomy Patients , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Andersen,et al.  Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area. II. Spatial properties. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccadic dysmetria in a patient with a right frontoparietal lesion. The importance of corollary discharge for accurate spatial behaviour. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[13]  M Mishkin,et al.  A role for the corpus callosum in visual area V4 of the macaque , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  W. Heide,et al.  Cortical control of double‐step saccades: Implications for spatial orientation , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Callosal window between prefrontal cortices: cognitive interaction to retrieve long-term memory. , 1998, Science.

[18]  Christian Quaia,et al.  The maintenance of spatial accuracy by the perisaccadic remapping of visual receptive fields , 1998, Neural Networks.

[19]  Paul W. Glimcher,et al.  Response fields of intraparietal neurons quantified with multiple saccadic targets , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval , 1999, Nature.

[21]  C L Colby,et al.  Visual, saccade-related, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey extrastriate area V3A. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  S. Ben Hamed,et al.  Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. II. Memory responses. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  W. Brown,et al.  Spatial attention in agenesis of the corpus callosum: shifting attention between visual fields , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The time course of perisaccadic receptive field shifts in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.