A three‐dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation

A common problem in the quantification of the orientation of the femoral neck is the difficulty to determine its true axis; however, this axis is typically estimated visually only. Moreover, the orientation of the femoral neck is commonly analysed using angles that are dependent on anatomical planes of reference and only quantify the orientation in two dimensions. The purpose of this study is to establish a method to determine the three‐dimensional orientation of the femoral neck using a three‐dimensional model. An accurate determination of the femoral neck axis requires a reconsideration of the complex architecture of the proximal femur. The morphology of the femoral neck results from both the medial and arcuate trabecular systems, and the asymmetry of the cortical bone. Given these considerations, two alternative models, in addition to the cylindrical one frequently assumed, were tested. The surface geometry of the femoral neck was subsequently used to fit one cylinder, two cylinders and successive cross‐sectional ellipses. The model based on successive ellipses provided a significantly smaller average deviation than the two other models (P < 0.001) and reduced the observer‐induced measurement error. Comparisons with traditional measurements and analyses on a sample of 91 femora were also performed to assess the validity of the model based on successive ellipses. This study provides a semi‐automatic and accurate method for the determination of the functional three‐dimensional femoral neck orientation avoiding the use of a reference plane. This innovative method has important implications for future studies that aim to document and understand the change in the orientation of the femoral neck associated with the acquisition of a bipedal gait in humans. Moreover, the precise determination of the three‐dimensional orientation has implications in current research involved in developing clinical applications in diagnosis, hip surgery and rehabilitation.

[1]  Dennis E. Slice,et al.  Modern Morphometrics In Physical Anthropology , 2005 .

[2]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Radiographic changes in the clavicle and proximal femur and their use in the determination of skeletal age at death. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  H. A. Durham ANTEVERSION OF THE FEMORAL NECK IN THE NORMAL FEMUR: AND ITS RELATION TO CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP , 1915 .

[4]  F. Pauwels Über die Verteilung der Spongiosadichte im coxalen Femurende und ihre Bedeutung für die Lehre vom funktionellen Bau des Knochens , 1965 .

[5]  W. Plitz,et al.  Forces Acting on the Juvenile Hip Joint in the One‐Legged Stance , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[6]  P. Kingsley,et al.  A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[8]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. , 1996, Bone.

[9]  H. Frost,et al.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[11]  L. Staheli,et al.  Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. Denormandie,et al.  The real measurement of anteversion of the femoral neck by computed tomography (CT scan) , 1997, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[14]  C. Ruff,et al.  Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  J H Wedge,et al.  Anteversion of the femur and idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Christopher B. Ruff,et al.  Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: A structural analysis of bone mineral data , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[17]  C. Simonis,et al.  Study of femoral torsion during prenatal growth: interpretations associated with the effects of intrauterine pressure. , 2011, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 1. Spine and pelvis. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[19]  S. Lele,et al.  Landmark Morphometrics and the Analysis of Variation , 2005 .

[20]  S. B. Park,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2:3D modelling method , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[21]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus , 1980 .

[22]  C. Lovejoy Evolution of human walking. , 1988, Scientific American.

[23]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  E. Schneider,et al.  Variability of femoral muscle attachments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  T. Nishida,et al.  Cross-Sectional Morphology of the Femoral Neck of Wild Chimpanzees , 2010, International Journal of Primatology.

[27]  S B Murphy,et al.  Femoral anteversion. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  A. Shands,et al.  Torsion of the femur; a follow-up report on the use of the Dunlap method for its determination. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  T. Terjesen,et al.  Clinical determination of femoral anteversion. A comparison with established techniques. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[31]  L. C. Hollister,et al.  A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  F G Parsons,et al.  The Characters of the English Thigh-Bone. , 1914, Journal of anatomy and physiology.

[33]  A. Moulton,et al.  A direct method of measuring femoral anteversion using ultrasound. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[35]  M. Rooze,et al.  Theoretical Study of the Decrease in the Femoral Neck Anteversion during Growth , 2002, Cells Tissues Organs.

[36]  E. Tayton Femoral anteversion: a necessary angle or an evolutionary vestige? , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[37]  A. C. Merchant HIP ABDUCTOR MUSCLE FORCE; AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF HIP POSITION WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ROTATION. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  K. Rafferty,et al.  Structural design of the femoral neck in primates. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[39]  T. vonLanz Physiologic deviations in the development of the human hip joint , 1951 .

[40]  R. Siffert Patterns of deformity of the developing hip. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  Todd J. Krochta,et al.  Cortical bone distribution in the femoral neck of hominoids: implications for the locomotion of Australopithecus afarensis. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  R. W. Soames,et al.  Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus. Contributions on the Functional Anatomy of the Locomotor Apparatus. , 1982 .

[43]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[44]  D. Magilligan Calculation of the angle of anteversion by means of horizontal lateral roentgenography. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[45]  Parsons Fg,et al.  The Characters of the English Thigh-Bone. , 1914 .

[46]  P. Tinley,et al.  Validity and reliability of existing and modified clinical methods of measuring femoral and tibiofibular torsion in healthy subjects: Use of different reference axes may improve reliability , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[47]  R. Bilić,et al.  Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles , 1997, International Orthopaedics.

[48]  S. Rogers A METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE ANGLE OF TORSION OF THE NECK OF THE FEMUR , 1931 .

[49]  L. Crane,et al.  Measuring femoral anteversion; the problem and a method. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  L. Kinzl,et al.  Length and torsion of the lower limb. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[51]  E. Trinkaus,et al.  Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational variation in human femoral neck‐shaft angles , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[52]  B. Daglar,et al.  Alternative reliable techniques in femoral torsion measurement , 2006, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[53]  Lovejoy Co Evolution of Human Walking , 1988 .

[54]  T. Terjesen,et al.  Femoral anteversion in normal adults. Ultrasound measurements in 50 men and 50 women. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[55]  V. T. Inman Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. , 1947, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[56]  C. Lovejoy The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 2. Hip and thigh. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[57]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[58]  H Preuschoft,et al.  Ontogeny of the knee joint in humans, great apes and fossil hominids: pelvi-femoral relationships during postnatal growth in humans. , 1996, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[59]  C. Tardieu Development of the human hind limb and its importance for the evolution of bipedalism , 2010 .

[60]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications. , 2005, Bone.

[61]  S. I. Kim,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[62]  R. D. McLeish,et al.  Abduction forces in the one-legged stance. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  Marta Mirazón Lahr,et al.  The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[64]  E. Seeman,et al.  Fracture Site‐Specific Deficits in Bone Size and Volumetric Density in Men with Spine or Hip Fractures , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[65]  V. Jansson,et al.  Function-Orientated Structural Analysis of the Proximal Human Femur , 2009, Cells Tissues Organs.