Supercomputers to improve the performance in higher education: A review of the literature

Abstract The use of Supercomputers is currently very widespread, constituting an essential component in many fields of science. The interest in the use of high performance computation is increasing in a wider and more diverse population of higher education students, mainly senior undergraduates and postgraduates, because the use of these infrastructures allows learners to improve their skills and the results of their training. For this reason, the demand of courses related to supercomputing increases continuously. In this paper we propose, through a wide review of primary studies, several questions that have been considered as a way of knowing the most widely-used contents in Supercomputing training. We have focused on the factors considered for improving training in Supercomputing, in order to improve the results of researchers in higher education organizations, to identify the limitations of Supercomputing training, and to provide solutions for these limitations. During the search procedure for answering research questions, 1911 studies were considered in the first selection. Through the definition of inclusion and exclusion codes in the results of searching databases, 136 published articles were studied. Finally, using quality criteria, 34 studies were identified as relevant in answering the research questions. Several factors were described, such as the way in which courses related to Supercomputing are organized, the adaptations that are currently being applied in curricula related to the students of these techniques, the use of problem-solving training and the qualification of teachers, among the most relevant ones, as well as several limitations of this type of training and the identification of solutions for these limitations. Data was collected by searching keywords related to Supercomputing training and education in the most important databases used in Computational Science, finding empirical evidence to support the positive effect of High Performance Computers (HPC) on educators and researchers. The implications of this study are: first, it provides a summary of the most relevant factors in improving training, as well as the factors that improve the results through the use of a Supercomputer; and second, it provides the analysis of the limitations found for a better performance of learners and the solutions for these limitations.

[1]  Yasemin Gülbahar,et al.  Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[2]  A. Haig,et al.  The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12 , 2009, Medical teacher.

[3]  I. R. Hart,et al.  BEME Guide No. 1: Best Evidence Medical Education. , 1999, Medical teacher.

[4]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  ChickScope: An interactive MRI classroom curriculum innovation for K-12 , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Cher Ping Lim.  Online learning in higher education: necessary and sufficient conditions , 2005 .

[6]  Kelly P. Gaither,et al.  Visualization at Supercomputing Centers: The Tale of Little Big Iron and the Three Skinny Guys , 2011, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Homma Farian,et al.  Teaching high-performance computing in the undergraduate college CS curriculum , 2008 .

[8]  Bairbekova Gaziza,et al.  Parallel Computing in Training of Informatics Teachers , 2012 .

[9]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Measuring effectiveness for best evidence medical education: a discussion , 2001, Medical teacher.

[10]  Yair Levy,et al.  A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[11]  Wendy Wood,et al.  An International Systematic Mapping Review of Educational Approaches and Teaching Methods in Occupational Therapy , 2013 .

[12]  Michael M. Resch.  Remarks on Supercomputing in Germany , 2005, Prax. Inf.verarb. Kommun..

[13]  José N. Onuchic,et al.  SCIENCE EDUCATION: Enhanced: Educating Future Scientists , 2003 .

[14]  Vassil N. Alexandrov,et al.  Computational Science Research Methods for Science Education at PG Level , 2015, ICCS.

[15]  Erik Duval,et al.  WESPOT: Inquiry based learning meets learning analytics , 2012 .

[16]  T. Dornan,et al.  Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13 , 2010, Medical teacher.

[17]  Stephen Emmott,et al.  Towards 2020 Science , 2006 .

[18]  Emilio Luque,et al.  An Innovative Teaching Strategy to Understand High-Performance Systems through Performance Evaluation , 2012, ICCS.

[19]  M. Hammick.  A BEME review: a little illumination , 2005, Medical teacher.

[20]  Tassos A. Mikropoulos,et al.  Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999-2009) , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  H. Cooper.  Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews , 1988 .

[22]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[23]  J. M. Richardson.  An agenda for improved evaluation of supercomputer performance , 1987 .

[24]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[25]  Rebecca Armstrong,et al.  Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews , 2011, Research synthesis methods.

[26]  Arlene Fink,et al.  Conducting research literature reviews : from the internet to paper , 2014 .

[27]  Martha Reeves,et al.  Evaluation of Training , 1993 .

[28]  Monique Volman,et al.  A Variety of Roles for a New Type of Teachereducational Technology and the Teaching Profession , 2005 .

[29]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Türk Fen,et al.  Implications of Learning Theories for Effective Technology Integration and Pre-service Teacher Training: A Critical Literature Review , 2005 .

[31]  Vicente Matellán Olivera,et al.  Historical review and future challenges in Supercomputing and Networks of Scientific Communication , 2015, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[32]  Ulrich Rüde,et al.  High Performance Computing Education for Students in Computational Engineering , 2005, International Conference on Computational Science.

[33]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[34]  Yong Hu,et al.  Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[35]  James Patton Jones,et al.  Scheduling for Parallel Supercomputing: A Historical Perspective of Achievable Utilization , 1999, JSSPP.

[36]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[37]  Ed Smeets,et al.  Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Birgit Bomsdorf,et al.  Adaptation of Learning Spaces: Supporting Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Distance Education , 2005, Mobile Computing and Ambient Intelligence.