Differential evolution solution to transformer no-load loss reduction problem

After the completion of core manufacturing and before the assembly of transformer active part, 2N small individual cores and 2N large individual cores are available and have to be optimally combined into N transformers so as to minimise the total no-load loss (NLL) of N transformers. This complex combinatorial optimisation problem is called transformer no-load loss reduction (TNLLR) problem. A new approach combining differential evolution (DE) and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) to solve TNLLR problem is proposed. MLPs are used to predict NLL of wound core distribution transformers. An improved differential evolution (IDE) method is proposed for the solution of TNLLR problem. The modifications of IDE in comparison to the simple DE method are (i) the scaling factor F is varied randomly within some range, (ii) an auxiliary set is employed to enhance the population diversity, (iii) the newly generated trial vector is compared with the nearest parent and (iv) the simple feasibility rule is used to treat the constraints. Application results show that the performance of the proposed method is better than that of two other methods, that is, conventional grouping process and genetic algorithm. Moreover, the proposed method provides 7.3% reduction in the cost of transformer main materials.

[1]  L. Lakshminarasimman,et al.  Short-term scheduling of hydrothermal power system with cascaded reservoirs by using modified differential evolution , 2006 .

[2]  J. Driesen,et al.  Reducing Losses in Distribution Transformers , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  K. P. Wong,et al.  Robust power system stabiliser design under multi-operating conditions using differential evolution , 2008 .

[4]  J.-P. Chiou,et al.  A variable scaling hybrid differential evolution for solving large-scale power dispatch problems , 2009 .

[5]  Anthony John Moses,et al.  Investigation of magnetic degradation of wound cores due to adhesive bonding , 1992 .

[6]  Ji-Pyng Chiou,et al.  Ant direction hybrid differential evolution for solving large capacitor placement problems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  R.S. Girgis,et al.  Measured Variability of Performance Parameters of Power & Distribution Transformers , 2006, 2005/2006 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[9]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[10]  Stefanos Kollias,et al.  A novel iron loss reduction technique for distribution transformers based on a combined genetic algorithm - neural network approach , 2001 .

[11]  K.P. Wong,et al.  Application of Differential Evolution Algorithm for Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  C. Su,et al.  Variable scaling hybrid differential evolution for solving network reconfiguration of distribution systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Ching-Tzong Su,et al.  Network reconfiguration of distribution systems using improved mixed-integer hybrid differential evolution , 2002 .

[14]  Xin Yao,et al.  Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  Z. Valkovic,et al.  Influence of transformer core design on power losses , 1982 .

[16]  Pavlos S. Georgilakis.  Spotlight on Modern Transformer Design , 2009 .

[17]  R. S. Girgis,et al.  Other Factors Contributing to the Core Loss Performance of Power and Distribution Transformers , 2001 .

[18]  K. S. Swarup,et al.  Solving multi-objective optimal power flow using differential evolution , 2008 .

[19]  C. Su,et al.  Network Reconfiguration of Distribution Systems Using Improved Mixed-Integer Hybrid Differential Evolution , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[20]  Chih-Wen Liu,et al.  Non-smooth/non-convex economic dispatch by a novel hybrid differential evolution algorithm , 2007 .

[21]  R. S. Girgis,et al.  Experimental investigations on effect of core production attributes on transformer core loss performance , 1998 .

[22]  Z. Dong,et al.  A Modified Differential Evolution Algorithm With Fitness Sharing for Power System Planning , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  Anthony John Moses.  Factors affecting localised flux and iron loss distribution in laminated cores , 1984 .

[24]  Xianzhong Duan,et al.  Study of differential evolution for optimal reactive power flow , 2007 .

[25]  Helmut Pfützner,et al.  Influence of geometric parameters on the magnetic properties of model transformer cores , 1996 .

[26]  René Thomsen,et al.  Multimodal optimization using crowding-based differential evolution , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753).

[27]  M. Montaz Ali,et al.  Population set-based global optimization algorithms: some modifications and numerical studies , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Martin J. Heathcote,et al.  1 – Transformer theory , 2007 .

[29]  Z. Godec,et al.  Influence of slitting on core losses and magnetization curve of grain-oriented electrical steels , 1977 .