Laboratory and Field Evaluations of the GeoAir2 Air Quality Monitor for Use in Indoor Environments

Low-cost aerosol sensors open routes to exposure assessment and air monitoring in various indoor and outdoor environments. This study evaluated the accuracy of GeoAir2––a recently developed low-cost particulate matter (PM) monitor––using two types of aerosols (salt and dust), and the effect of changes in relative humidity on its measurements in laboratory settings. For the accuracy experiments, 32 units of GeoAir2 were used, and for the humidity experiments, 3 units of GeoAir2 were used, alongside the OPC-N3 low-cost sensor and MiniWRAS reference instrument. The normal distribution of slopes between the salt and dust aerosols was compared for the accuracy experiments. In addition, the performance of GeoAir2 in indoor environments was evaluated compared to the pDR-1500 reference instrument by collocating GeoAir2 and pDR-1500 at three different homes for five days. For salt and dust aerosols smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5), both GeoAir2 (r = 0.96–0.99) and OPC-N3 (r = 0.98–0.99) were highly correlated with the MiniWRAS reference instrument. However, GeoAir2 was less influenced by changes in humidity than OPC-N3. While GeoAir2 reported an increase in mass concentrations ranging from 100% to 137% for low and high concentrations, an increase between 181% and 425% was observed for OPC-N3. The normal distribution of the slopes for the salt aerosols was narrower than dust aerosol, which shows closer slope similarities for salt aerosols. This study also found that GeoAir2 was highly correlated with the pDR-1500 reference instrument in indoor environments (r = 0.80–0.99). These results demonstrate potential for GeoAir2 for indoor air monitoring and exposure assessments.

[1]  Daniel J. Blankenberg,et al.  Evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors OPC N2 and PM Nova for aerosol monitoring , 2022, Atmospheric Pollution Research.

[2]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations , 2021 .

[3]  Yoo Min Park,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures , 2021, Sensors.

[4]  Y. Park,et al.  GeoAir—A Novel Portable, GPS-Enabled, Low-Cost Air-Pollution Sensor: Design Strategies to Facilitate Citizen Science Research and Geospatial Assessments of Personal Exposure , 2021, Sensors.

[5]  Huaqiao Gui,et al.  Effect of relative humidity on the performance of five cost-effective PM sensors , 2021 .

[6]  Huy Nguyen,et al.  Evaluating Low-Cost Commercially Available Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring and Application of Sensor Calibration Methods for Improving Accuracy , 2021 .

[7]  Jordan D. Clark,et al.  A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices , 2021 .

[8]  Aleksandar S. Anđelković,et al.  Performance assessment of low-cost environmental monitors and single sensors under variable indoor air quality and thermal conditions , 2021, Building and Environment.

[9]  J. Volckens,et al.  Effects of aerosol type and simulated aging on performance of low-cost PM sensors , 2020 .

[10]  Y. Lim,et al.  Effects of short-term fine particulate matter exposure on acute respiratory infection in children. , 2020, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[11]  F. Liang,et al.  Long term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and incidence of stroke: prospective cohort study from the China-PAR project , 2019, BMJ.

[12]  F. Pope,et al.  Effect of aerosol composition on the performance of low-cost optical particle counter correction factors , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[13]  B. Kerkez,et al.  Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  M. I. Mead,et al.  Use of networks of low cost air quality sensors to quantify air quality in urban settings , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[15]  Thomas M. Peters,et al.  Sensor Selection to Improve Estimates of Particulate Matter Concentration from a Low-Cost Network , 2018, Sensors.

[16]  J. Namieśnik,et al.  Indoor air quality of everyday use spaces dedicated to specific purposes—a review , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Tania Martellini,et al.  Indoor Air Quality and Health , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  C. Bai,et al.  Particulate matter‐induced epigenetic changes and lung cancer , 2017, The clinical respiratory journal.

[19]  F. Pope,et al.  of Birmingham Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring , 2018 .

[20]  Laura Hallett,et al.  Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108) , 2016, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[21]  V. Kim,et al.  The Effects of Air Pollution and Temperature on COPD , 2016, COPD.

[22]  Geb Thomas,et al.  Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols , 2016, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[23]  Mandy Berg,et al.  Aerosol Measurement Principles Techniques And Applications , 2016 .

[24]  Yang Wang,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Three Low-Cost Particle Sensors for Particulate Matter Measurement , 2015 .

[25]  Wan Jiao,et al.  Field assessment of the Village Green Project: an autonomous community air quality monitoring system. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  V. Pont,et al.  Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: Past, current and emerging issues , 2013 .

[27]  A. Peters,et al.  Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[28]  Frank J. Kelly,et al.  WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected pollutants. , 2010 .

[29]  C. Delerue-Matos,et al.  Influence of tobacco smoke on carcinogenic PAH composition in indoor PM10 and PM2.5 , 2009 .

[30]  A. Chaloulakou,et al.  Indoor and outdoor PM mass and number concentrations at schools in the Athens area , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[31]  Peter J Franklin,et al.  Indoor air quality and respiratory health of children. , 2007, Paediatric respiratory reviews.

[32]  A. Salmon,et al.  Development of a chronic inhalation reference level for respirable crystalline silica. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  H. Hansson,et al.  Hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles in the Po Valley , 1992 .

[34]  David S. Ensor,et al.  Airborne particle sizes and sources found in indoor air , 1990 .