Spectrum of Skeletal Imaging Features in Osteopetrosis: Inheritance Pattern and Radiological Associations

Osteopetrosis (from the Greek “osteo”: bone; “petrosis”: stone) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of rare diseases of the skeleton, sharing the same main characteristic of an abnormally increased bone density. Dense bones in radiological studies are considered the hallmark of these diseases, and the reason for the common term used: “Marble bone disease”. Interestingly, a radiologist, Dr. Albers-Schonberg, described this disease for the first time in Germany in 1904. Indeed, radiology has a key role in the clinical diagnosis of osteopetrosis and is fundamental in assessing the disease severity and complications, as well as in follow-up controls and the evaluation of the response to treatment. Osteopetrosis includes a broad spectrum of genetic mutations with very different clinical symptoms, age onset, and prognosis (from mild to severe). This diversity translates into different imaging patterns related to specific mutations, and different disease severity. The main recognized types of osteopetrosis are the infantile malignant forms with autosomal recessive transmission (ARO—including the rarer X-linked recessive form); the intermediate autosomal recessive form (IAO); and the autosomal dominant ones ADO, type I, and type II, the latter being called ‘Albers-Schonberg’ disease. Imaging features may change among those distinct types with different patterns, severities, skeletal segment involvement, and speeds of progression. There are several classical and well-recognized radiological features related to osteopetrosis: increased bone density (all types with different degrees of severity assuming a ‘Marble Bone Appearance’ especially in the ARO type), different metaphyseal alterations/enlargement including the so-called ‘Erlenmeyer flask deformity’ (particularly of femoral bones, more frequent in ADO type 2, and less frequent in ARO and IAO), ‘bone in bone’ appearance (more frequent in ADO type 2, less frequent in ARO and IAO), and ‘rugger-jersey spine’ appearance (typical of ADO type 2). After conducting an overview of the epidemiological and clinical characteristic of the disease, this review article aims at summarizing the main radiological features found in different forms of osteopetrosis together with their inheritance pattern.

[1]  S. Arulkumaran,et al.  Imaging in osteopetrosis. , 2022, Bone.

[2]  M. Econs,et al.  Bone marrow transplantation as a therapy for autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2 in mice , 2022, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[3]  P. Spinnato,et al.  An Extremely Rare, Atypical and Genetically-Undetermined Form of Osteopetrosis. , 2021, Current medical imaging.

[4]  M. Econs,et al.  Radiographic imaging, densitometry and disease severity in Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2 , 2020, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  J. Kaggie,et al.  Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities , 2020, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  L. Dimeglio,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Osteopetrosis: Consensus Guidelines From the Osteopetrosis Working Group , 2017, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  N. Appelman-Dijkstra,et al.  The rugger-jersey spine. , 2016, Kidney international.

[8]  M. Farias,et al.  Bone Mineral Density and Microarchitecture in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis: A Report of Two Cases , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  W. O'brien,et al.  Osteopetrosis - Classic Imaging Findings in the Spine. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[10]  M. Muraca,et al.  Osteopetrosis and Its Relevance for the Discovery of New Functions Associated with the Skeleton , 2015, International journal of endocrinology.

[11]  I. Fogelman,et al.  Osteopetrosis: Radiological & Radionuclide Imaging , 2015, Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India.

[12]  D. Rimoin,et al.  The Erlenmeyer flask bone deformity in the skeletal dysplasias , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[13]  Z. Stark,et al.  Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases , 2022 .

[14]  S. Kaste,et al.  Quantitative bone mineral density assessment in malignant infantile osteopetrosis , 2007, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[15]  P. deBaat,et al.  [Osteopetrosis. Classification, etiology, treatment options and implications for oral health]. , 2005 .

[16]  M. P. Heijboer,et al.  [Osteopetrosis. Classification, etiology, treatment options and implications for oral health]. , 2005, Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde.

[17]  A. Davies,et al.  Bone within a bone. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[18]  J. Bollerslev,et al.  Localization of the Gene Causing Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type I to Chromosome 11q12‐13 , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  J. Curé,et al.  Cranial MR imaging of osteopetrosis. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  J. Laredo,et al.  Type II autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (Albers-Schönberg disease): clinical and radiological manifestations in 42 patients. , 2000, Bone.

[21]  F. Shapiro Osteopetrosis. Current clinical considerations. , 1993 .

[22]  A. Elster,et al.  Cranial imaging in autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Part I. Facial bones and calvarium. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  Wolfgang F. Dahnert,et al.  Radiology Review Manual , 1991 .

[24]  J. Bollerslev,et al.  Radiological, biochemical and hereditary evidence of two types of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. , 1988, Bone.

[25]  P. Beighton,et al.  A review of the osteopetroses. , 1977, Postgraduate medical journal.

[26]  R. Loría-Cortés,et al.  Osteopetrosis in children: a report of 26 cases. , 1977, The Journal of pediatrics.

[27]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Osteopetrosis , 1972 .