Long-latency evoked potentials and reaction time.

Tone pips separated by a constant 1 sec interval were delivered to 12 subjects. The pips were of three pitches given in a random sequence. The 400 and 1600 Hz pips each had a probability of 0.1 and the 800 Hz pips had a probability of 0.8. For each subject, either the 400 or 1600 Hz pips were designated as targets in a reaction time (RT) task. Stimulus-synchronized averages (SSAs) to infrequent tones contained two prominent waves: a P3 and a slow wave (SW). SW and P3 amplitudes were larger, and P3 latency was 15 msec shorter, to targets than to non-targets. SSAs were computed for RT quartiles (Q1–Q4) of each subject. Between Q1 and Q4, P3 amplitude decreased, while SW amplitude increased, demonstrating behavioral and dissociation of the two waves. Between Q1 and Q4, RTs increased from 366 to 540 msec, while P3 latency at Cz increased from 328 to 359 msec. Response-synchronized averages computed for each RT quartile showed no response-related deflections that could explain the effects in the SSAs.

[1]  W. R. Goff,et al.  Distribution of the human average movement potential. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[3]  J. C. Corby,et al.  Differential contributions of blinks and vertical eye movements as artifacts in EEG recording. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[4]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  B S Kopell,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials to unpredictable shifts in pitch. , 1976, Psychophysiology.

[6]  P. Lang,et al.  The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV). , 1973, Biological psychology.

[7]  B S Kopell,et al.  Prevalence and methods of control of the cephalic skin potential EEG artifact. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[8]  N. Squires,et al.  Vertex evoked potentials in a rating-scale detection task: relation to signal probability. , 1975, Behavioral biology.

[9]  B S Kopell,et al.  Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials. , 1976, Psychophysiology.

[10]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Bisensory stimulation: Inferring decision-related processes from the P300 component. , 1977 .

[12]  G. McCarthy,et al.  On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Karlin,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials, motor potentials and reaction time. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  D G Wastell,et al.  Statistical detection of individual evoked responses: an evaluation of Woody's adaptive filter. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Topography of the human motor potential. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.