Study of Student Community Movements Against the Development of a Geothermal Power Plant in Gunung Talang

The purpose of this paper is to explain how the relationship between foreign policies based on the 'Blame Game' could affect the social conditions of society, especially in terms of discrimination against people of Asian descent. The act of accusing each other by Western countries against China over who should actually be responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic has made international political conditions more tense and heated. China's defensive foreign policy strategy turned out to be aggressive and even creates a distortion of information regarding the truth of the origins of the pandemic. So the result is a Blame Game that is destructive, uncooperative, and actually makes problems unresolved where to deal with a global pandemic requires collective action. This is also leads to the increase of discrimination acts towards Asian community. This paper uses an explanatory-qualitative method, with data collection techniques through literature study. Constructivism theory and the concept of Political Racism are used as an analytical tool to explain how the relationship between the research variable. As the result, political elites create identities through the blaming game on various media platforms especially social media, which impacts on the creation of xenophobic perceptions towards the Asian community which lead to discriminatory attitudes and violence both directly and through social media. Therefore, to overcome the structural problems that occur, it is necessary to have the willingness of each political elite to be open and cooperative regarding the problem of investigating the origin of the Covid-19 virus. So that will ease tensions between countries, reducing negative stigma, and the number of discriminatory behavior towards Asian descent community during this Pandemic.

[1]  Dinita Setyawati Injustice and Environmental Harm in Extractive Industries and Solar Energy Policies in Indonesia , 2021, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy.

[2]  R. R. A. Hakim Model Energi Indonesia, Tinjauan Potensi Energi Terbarukan untuk Ketahanan Energi di Indonesia: Sebuah Ulasan , 2020 .

[3]  B. Kusumasari,et al.  Key Elements of Environmental Justice in the Geothermal Power Plant Resistance Movement , 2019 .

[4]  Andi Saputra,et al.  SURVEI PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA KOTA PADANG MENGGUNAKAN TEORI USES AND GRATIFICATIONS , 2019, BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI.

[5]  A. Dunlap “A Bureaucratic Trap:” Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and Wind Energy Development in Juchitán, Mexico , 2018 .

[6]  Ali Kharrazi,et al.  Cultural factors of sustainable energy development: A case study of geothermal energy in Iceland and Japan , 2017 .

[7]  Huiquan Zhou,et al.  Blogging With a Mission, Blogging Within a System: Chinese Government-organized NGOs, Corporate-organized NGOs, Grassroots, and Student Organizations on Weibo , 2017 .

[8]  Thomas E. Shriver,et al.  Tactics and Targets: Explaining Shifts in Grassroots Environmental Resistance , 2017 .

[9]  R. Dutu Challenges and policies in Indonesia's energy sector , 2016 .

[10]  Brian L. Djumaty Dari “Ya” Menjadi “Tidak” Studi tentang Persepsi dan Sikap Masyarakat Desa Idamdehe terhadap Rencana Pembangunan PLTP di Idamdehe dan Idamdehe Gamsungi , 2016 .

[11]  Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia,et al.  Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review , 2016 .

[12]  Matthew S. Winters,et al.  Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia , 2015 .

[13]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs , 2013 .

[14]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance , 2011 .

[15]  Karen Bell,et al.  Environmental justice in Cuba , 2011 .

[16]  P. Pezzullo,et al.  Environmental justice and environmentalism : the social justice challenge to the environmental movement , 2007 .

[17]  K. Popovski Political and public acceptance of geothermal energy , 2003 .

[18]  Raffaele Cataldi,et al.  Social acceptance: a sine qua non for geothermal development in the 21st century , 1999 .

[19]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .