A new similarity measure for nonlocal filtering in the presence of multiplicative noise

A new similarity measure and nonlocal filters for images corrupted by multiplicative noise are presented. The considered filters are generalizations of the nonlocal means filter of Buades et al., which is known to be well suited for removing additive Gaussian noise. To adapt this filter to different noise models, the involved patch comparison has first of all to be performed by a suitable noise dependent similarity measure. For this purpose, a recently proposed probabilistic measure for general noise models by Deledalle et al. is studied. This measure is analyzed in the context of conditional density functions and its properties are examined for data corrupted by additive and multiplicative noise. Since it turns out to have unfavorable properties for multiplicative noise, a new similarity measure is deduced consisting of a probability density function specially chosen for this type of noise. The properties of this new measure are studied theoretically as well as by numerical experiments. To finally obtain nonlocal filters, a weighted maximum likelihood estimation framework is applied, which also incorporates the noise statistics. Moreover, the weights occurring in these filters are defined using the new similarity measure and different adaptations are proposed to further improve the results. Finally, restoration results for images corrupted by multiplicative Gamma and Rayleigh noise are presented to demonstrate the very good performance of these nonlocal filters.

[1]  Alan Jeffrey,et al.  Handbook of mathematical formulas and integrals , 1995 .

[2]  G. Grimmett,et al.  Probability and random processes , 2002 .

[3]  Guy Gilboa,et al.  Nonlocal Operators with Applications to Image Processing , 2008, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[4]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  The Bayesian choice : from decision-theoretic foundations to computational implementation , 2007 .

[5]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Denoising of single-look SAR images based on variance stabilization and nonlocal filters , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Electromagnetic Theory.

[8]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Guy Gilboa,et al.  Nonlocal Linear Image Regularization and Supervised Segmentation , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[10]  Gabriele Steidl,et al.  Removing Multiplicative Noise by Douglas-Rachford Splitting Methods , 2010, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[11]  Ali Esmaili,et al.  Probability and Random Processes , 2005, Technometrics.

[12]  J. Polzehl,et al.  Propagation-Separation Approach for Local Likelihood Estimation , 2006 .

[13]  Anirban DasGupta,et al.  Fundamentals of Probability: A First Course , 2010 .

[14]  Henri Maitre,et al.  Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Images (Digital Signal and Image Processing series) , 2006 .

[15]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Local maximum likelihood estimation and inference , 1998 .

[16]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Francisco Cribari-Neto,et al.  Dealing with monotone likelihood in a model for speckled data , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[18]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  Image Denoising Methods. A New Nonlocal Principle , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Jérôme Darbon,et al.  SAR Image Regularization With Fast Approximate Discrete Minimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  A. Cohen.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics , 1979 .

[21]  Stephen Lin,et al.  A Probabilistic Intensity Similarity Measure based on Noise Distributions , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[23]  Tanja Teuber,et al.  Nonlocal Filters for Removing Multiplicative Noise , 2011, SSVM.

[24]  Gilles Aubert,et al.  A Variational Approach to Removing Multiplicative Noise , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[25]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Optimal Inversion of the Anscombe Transformation in Low-Count Poisson Image Denoising , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  M Tur,et al.  When is speckle noise multiplicative? , 1982, Applied optics.

[27]  Florence Tupin,et al.  Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Evaluation of Four Probability Distribution Models for Speckle in Clinical Cardiac Ultrasound Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Florence Tupin,et al.  Poisson NL means: Unsupervised non local means for Poisson noise , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[30]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  Multiplicative Noise Removal Using L1 Fidelity on Frame Coefficients , 2008, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[31]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Bayesian Non-local Means Filter, Image Redundancy and Adaptive Dictionaries for Noise Removal , 2007, SSVM.

[32]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  Non-Local Means Denoising , 2011, Image Process. Line.

[33]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Rician Noise Removal by Non-Local Means Filtering for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio MRI: Applications to DT-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[34]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Improved estimation of clutter properties in speckled imagery , 2002 .

[35]  L. Shepp.  Probability Essentials , 2002 .

[36]  Henri Maitre,et al.  Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Images , 2008 .