In vitro modeling of dental water line contamination and decontamination

Abstract The contamination of dental unit water lines (DUWL) is an emerging concern in dentistry. The aim of this study was to use an in vitro DUWL to model microbial contamination and evaluate the decontamination efficacy of tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) solutions. A DUWL biofilm model used to simulate clinical conditions was used to generate a range of biofilms in DUWL. Three distinct biofilms were generated: (1) biofilm from water, (2) biofilm from a mix of water + contaminating human commensal bacteria, (3) biofilm from water with contaminating oral bacteria added after biofilm formed. The contaminating oral species used were Streptococcus oralis , Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus . Decontamination by simple water flushing or flushing with TAED was evaluated (2, 5 and 10 min intervals). The DUWL tubes were split and samples were plated onto a range of media, incubated and bacteria enumerated. Water flushing did not reduce the number of microorganisms detected. Bacteria were not detected from any of the TAED sampling points for any of the biofilm types tested. Interestingly, if contamination was introduced to new DUWL along with the waterborne species a biofilm was formed containing only the waterborne species. If however, an existing biofilm was present before the introduction of “contaminating” bacteria then these could be detected in the biofilm. This implies that if the DUWL are new or satisfactorily cleaned on a regular basis then the associated cross-contamination aspects are reduced. In conclusion, TAED provides effective control for DUWL biofilms.

[1]  I. Punwani,et al.  Contamination of dental unit cooling water with oral microorganisms and its prevention. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  A. Bennett,et al.  Microbial Biofilm Formation and Contamination of Dental-Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practice , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  G. Dolci,et al.  A new chemical formulation for control of dental unit water line contamination: An 'in vitro' and clinical 'study' , 2002, BMC oral health.

[4]  M. Wilson,et al.  Susceptibility of oral bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial agents. , 1996, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  J. Costerton,et al.  Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms , 2002, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[6]  J. Bagg,et al.  The ecology of Staphylococcus species in the oral cavity. , 2001, Journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  M. Martín The significance of the bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems , 1987, British Dental Journal.

[8]  J. Barbeau,et al.  Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  M. Kilian,et al.  Ecology of viridans streptococci in the oral cavity and pharynx. , 1991, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[10]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. , 1987, Annual review of microbiology.

[11]  B. Shearer,et al.  Biofilm and the dental office. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  D. Clewell,et al.  Prevalence, phenotype and genotype of oral enterococci. , 2004, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[13]  J. Barbeau,et al.  BIOFILMS, INFECTIOUS AGENTS, AND DENTAL UNIT WATERLINES: A REVIEW , 1998 .