The fastest (and simplest), the earliest: The locus of processing of rapid forms of motion aftereffect

Adaptation to directional motion has been shown to bias the perceived direction of a subsequently presented stationary or flickering test stimulus toward the opposite direction with respect to that of adaptation. This phenomenon, called motion aftereffect, is usually generated with adaptation periods of tens of seconds or minutes and has been shown to depend upon the functional integrity of visual area V5/MT. Rapid forms of MAE, arising and decaying within half a second (rMAE), can also be generated with sub-second adaptation durations. In order to investigate the neural substrate underlying the rMAE, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used just after the adaptation stimulus over areas V1/V2, V5/MT, or over the vertex. Results showed that, besides some reduction in strength of the rMAE when rTMS was delivered over V5/MT, it was maximally disrupted when stimulation was delivered over early visual areas V1/V2. This is the first study where a causal role of early visual cortices in MAE is demonstrated. Moreover, this finding supports the existence of multiple loci along the visual stream in which gain control takes place and generates the MAE as a byproduct. The specific locus is likely to depend on the specific stimulus used.

[1]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  S. Nishida,et al.  Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P. Mazzoni,et al.  Cross-fixation transfer of motion aftereffects with expansion motion , 2006, Vision Research.

[5]  M. Morgan,et al.  Predicting the motion after-effect from sensitivity loss , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Independent Aftereffects of Attention and Motion , 2000, Neuron.

[8]  A. Metha,et al.  Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions , 1999, Vision Research.

[9]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Left frontal eye field remembers “where” but not “what” , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Neural Representation of Speed in Macaque Area MT/V5 , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Tuning for Spatiotemporal Frequency and Speed in Directionally Selective Neurons of Macaque Striate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Timothy Ledgeway,et al.  Visual adaptation reveals asymmetric spatial frequency tuning for motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  R Blake,et al.  Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  R. Snowden,et al.  Phantom motion aftereffects – evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow , 1997, Current Biology.

[16]  H. Müller-Gärtner,et al.  The motion aftereffect: more than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies , 2001, Brain Research.

[17]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization , 2005, Vision Research.

[18]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Selective visual responses to expansion and rotation in the human MT complex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Lucia M. Vaina,et al.  The role of human extra-striate visual areas V5/MT and V2/V3 in the perception of the direction of global motion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  J. Gaddum Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Looking ahead: the perceived direction of gaze shifts before the eyes move. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[26]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Lisa Koski,et al.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Robin Laycock,et al.  Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  Temporal characteristics of global motion processing revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  Hiroshi Ashida,et al.  A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  What is the depth of a sinusoidal grating? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  G. Campana,et al.  Separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order patterns revealed by rapid forms of visual motion priming and motion aftereffect. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[35]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Effects Reveal the Neural Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Global motion adaptation , 2000, Vision Research.

[38]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  T. Ledgeway Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.

[40]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[41]  K. Ziemons,et al.  The Network of Brain Areas Involved in the Motion Aftereffect , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Visual area V5/MT remembers "what" but not "where". , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  N. Sutherland Figural After-Effects and Apparent Size , 1961 .

[44]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[45]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[46]  S. Zeki,et al.  The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  The role of high-level visual areas in short- and longer-lasting forms of neural plasticity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[49]  G. Mather,et al.  The motion aftereffect reloaded , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.