The self-esteem motive in social influence: agreement with valued majorities and disagreement with derogated minorities.

This research provides evidence for the role of self-esteem in social influence; it demonstrates that the positions taken by self-relevant social groups can threaten people's self-esteem. Participants who wished to align themselves with a majority group and who learned that the group held a counterattitudinal position suffered a reduction in self-esteem. Similarly, participants who wished to differentiate themselves from a derogated minority group and who learned that the group held attitudes similar to theirs experienced reduced self-esteem. Group attitudes, however, did not affect the self-esteem of participants who were indifferent to the group. In addition, this study demonstrates that self-relevant motivations direct the way people process influence appeals. Participants adopted interpretations of the issues that allowed them to align themselves with valued majorities and differentiate themselves from derogated minorities.

[1]  E. Aronson,et al.  When exemplification fails: hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  C M Steele,et al.  Self-image resilience and dissonance: the role of affirmational resources. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: II. Determination of Judgments by Group and by Ego Standards , 1940 .

[5]  S. Asch,et al.  The doctrine of suggestion, prestige and imitation in social psychology. , 1948, Psychological review.

[6]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[7]  Michael R. Solomon,et al.  Conformity as a Function of the Consistency of Positive Self- Evaluation with Being Liked and Being Right , 1983 .

[8]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[9]  From Dissonance To Disidentification: Selectivity in the Self-Affirmation Process , 1995 .

[10]  L. Lemyre,et al.  Intergroup Discrimination and Self-Esteem in the Minimal Group Paradigm , 1985 .

[11]  W. Wood,et al.  Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: the normative impact of majority and minority groups. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[13]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[14]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[15]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Enhancing self-esteem by directed-thinking tasks: cognitive and affective positivity asymmetries. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[17]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  W. Wood,et al.  Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[20]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[21]  S. Spencer,et al.  Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others , 1997 .

[22]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Impact of group consensus and social support on stimulus meaning: Mediation of conformity by cognitive restructuring. , 1980 .

[23]  Harry Kaufmann,et al.  Social psychology;: The study of human interaction , 1973 .