Restenosis detected by routine angiographic follow-up and late mortality after coronary stent placement.

[1]  Levon M Khachigian,et al.  Coronary In-stent Restenosis: Current Status and Future Strategies , 2022 .

[2]  F. Verheugt,et al.  Influence of planned six-month follow-up angiography on late outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  D. Holmes,et al.  Coronary artery stents. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  Does angiography six months after coronary intervention influence management and outcome? Benestent II Investigators. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Erbel,et al.  Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after angioplasty. , 1998, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Asymptomatic restenosis: should we (re)intervene? An unresolved dilemma. , 1998, American heart journal.

[7]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Four‐Year Experience With Palmaz‐Schatz Stenting in Coronary Angioplasty Complicated by Dissection With Threatened or Present Vessel Closure , 1994, Circulation.

[9]  J. Forrester,et al.  Universal angiographic follow-up in trials of new interventional devices. A concept whose time has passed. , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  D. Baim,et al.  Appropriate uses of angiographic follow-up in the evaluation of new technologies for coronary intervention. , 1994, Circulation.

[11]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Long‐term Clinical Follow‐up in Patients With Angiographic Restudy After Successful Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[12]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[13]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.