SkelGen: a general tool for structure-based de novo ligand design
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. J. Reece,et al. DNA gyrase: structure and function. , 1991, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.
[2] Roland L. Dunbrack,et al. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] R C Wade,et al. Rational modification of human synovial fluid phospholipase A2 inhibitors. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] D K Gehlhaar,et al. De novo design of enzyme inhibitors by Monte Carlo ligand generation. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[5] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] Philip M. Dean,et al. Evaluation of a method for controlling molecular scaffold diversity in de novo ligand design , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[7] Andrzej M. Brzozowski,et al. Brzozowski, A M. et al. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the estrogen receptor. Nature 389, 753-758 , 1997 .
[8] R Abagyan,et al. Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates , 1997, Proteins.
[9] Zbigniew Dauter,et al. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor , 1997, Nature.
[10] J. Briggs,et al. Structure-based drug design: computational advances. , 1997, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.
[11] R. Bohacek,et al. Modern computational chemistry and drug discovery: structure generating programs. , 1997, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[12] Michael M. Hann,et al. RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[13] B. Shoichet,et al. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[14] Johan Åqvist,et al. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[15] Computational ligand design by free energy minimization , 1999 .
[16] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DREAM++: Flexible docking program for virtual combinatorial libraries , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[17] X Fradera,et al. Similarity‐driven flexible ligand docking , 2000, Proteins.
[18] D. Kostrewa,et al. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] D. Moras,et al. Dimerization of Escherichia coli DNA-gyrase B Provides a Structural Mechanism for Activating the ATPase Catalytic Center* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[20] C. Dominguez,et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent and selective amidino bicyclic factor Xa inhibitors. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[21] B. X. Carlson,et al. A single glycine residue at the entrance to the first membrane-spanning domain of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor beta(2) subunit affects allosteric sensitivity to GABA and anesthetics. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.
[22] J A McCammon,et al. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.
[23] A. Caflisch,et al. Fragment-Based Flexible Ligand Docking by Evolutionary Optimization , 2001, Biological chemistry.
[24] Haiyan Liu,et al. Structure-based ligand design for flexible proteins: Application of new F-DycoBlock , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[25] R S Bohacek,et al. Aspartic protease inhibitors designed from computer-generated templates bind as predicted. , 2001, Organic letters.
[26] Z. Xiang,et al. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] R M Stroud,et al. Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.
[28] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[29] K. Fukasawa,et al. Structure-based generation of a new class of potent Cdk4 inhibitors: new de novo design strategy and library design. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[30] Wolfgang Guba,et al. Development of a virtual screening method for identification of "frequent hitters" in compound libraries. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[31] Philip M. Dean,et al. A validation study on the practical use of automated de novo design , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[32] G. Whitesides,et al. Combinatorial computational method gives new picomolar ligands for a known enzyme , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[33] Daniel Scheibe,et al. A fully integrated protein crystallization platform for small-molecule drug discovery. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.
[34] H. M. Vinkers,et al. SYNOPSIS: SYNthesize and OPtimize System in Silico. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[35] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[36] Amedeo Caflisch,et al. Efficient evaluation of binding free energy using continuum electrostatics solvation. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[38] B. Kuhn,et al. Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] R. Morphy,et al. Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] Christopher W Murray,et al. Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] Tomas Lundqvist. The devil is still in the details--driving early drug discovery forward with biophysical experimental methods. , 2005, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[42] Philip M. Dean,et al. Ligand docking and design in a flexible receptor site , 2005 .
[43] A. Caflisch,et al. Discovery of cell-permeable non-peptide inhibitors of beta-secretase by high-throughput docking and continuum electrostatics calculations. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[44] N. P. Todorov,et al. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[45] Paul Watts,et al. The application of microreactors for small scale organic synthesis , 2005 .
[46] Ursula Rothlisberger,et al. Variational particle number approach for rational compound design. , 2005, Physical review letters.
[47] Philip M Dean,et al. Computer-aided design of small molecules for chemical genomics. , 2005, Methods in molecular biology.
[48] R. Kim. Transporters and drug discovery: why, when, and how. , 2006, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[49] John P. Overington,et al. Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[50] Anthony Williams,et al. Exhaustive de novo Design of Low-Molecular-Weight Fragments Against the ATP-Binding Site of DNA-Gyrase , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[51] Paolo Bonvini,et al. Identification of ellagic acid as potent inhibitor of protein kinase CK2: a successful example of a virtual screening application. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[52] Matthew Clark,et al. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulation of Ligand-Protein Binding , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[53] Anthony Williams,et al. Generation and Selection of Novel Estrogen Receptor Ligands Using the De Novo Structure-Based Design Tool, SkelGen , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[54] N. P. Todorov,et al. De novo ligand design to an ensemble of protein structures , 2006, Proteins.