Dual-task walking over a compliant foam surface: A comparison of people with transfemoral amputation and controls.

People with lower limb amputation are unable to reliably sense ground characteristics due to compromised sensory inputs from the missing limb. As a result, they may rely on compensatory strategies, such as use of cognitive resources, when walking over complex surfaces. This study examined interactions between cognition and walking over a compliant surface in 14 people with transfemoral amputation (TFA) and 14 controls using a dual-task paradigm. Walking was assessed with quantitative motion analysis in both single-task (walking alone) and dual-task (walking while performing a cognitive task) conditions over a compliant foam surface. Outcomes were walking speed, step width, step time asymmetry, step time variability, and the speed and accuracy of cognitive task performance. For each outcome, effects of task (single-task, dual-task) and group (TFA, control) were examined with repeated-measures analysis of variance. No significant group-by-task interactions were observed for cognitive task performance. A significant group-by-task interaction for step time asymmetry indicated that participants with TFA increased temporal asymmetry in dual-task relative to single-task conditions, while control participants maintained symmetrical gait. The addition of a concurrent cognitive task did not differentially affect other aspects of gait between groups. Significant main effects of group for all walking outcomes indicated that participants with TFA walked slower, with wider, more asymmetric, and more variable steps than controls. Results suggest that gait quality degrades in challenging dual-task conditions for people with TFA, but not controls, consistent with the idea that people with TFA may use increased cognitive resources to control walking in complex environments.

[1]  W. Miller,et al.  The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  F. Horak,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Sensory Interaction on Balance , 1986 .

[3]  Brian J Hafner,et al.  Differences in function and safety between Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 and -3 transfemoral amputees and influence of prosthetic knee joint control. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  H. Houdijk,et al.  Variability and stability analysis of walking of transfemoral amputees. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  F. Franchignoni,et al.  Rasch validation of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and its short versions in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  A. Hof,et al.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[10]  B. Bloem,et al.  The “posture second” strategy: A review of wrong priorities in Parkinson's disease , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  M Jason Highsmith,et al.  Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mechanism versus C-Leg on Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair descent, and knee preference. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  F. O’Keeffe,et al.  Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  R. Gailey,et al.  Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Murray Mp,et al.  Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. , 1983 .

[15]  A. Lees,et al.  Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[16]  Sam L. Phillips,et al.  Differences in the Spatiotemporal Parameters of Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputee Gait , 2010 .

[17]  D. Potvin,et al.  Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Miroslav Janura,et al.  Temporal–spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  S. Fritz,et al.  Walking speed: the functional vital sign. , 2015, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[20]  W Lee Childers,et al.  Symmetrical kinematics does not imply symmetrical kinetics in people with transtibial amputation using cycling model. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  Independent domains of gait in older adults and associated motor and nonmotor attributes: validation of a factor analysis approach. , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[22]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Effects of explicit prioritization on dual task walking in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[24]  Dale W. Berry,et al.  Microprocessor prosthetic knees. , 2006, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[25]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice , 2006 .

[26]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  Self-Reported Cognitive Concerns in People With Lower Limb Loss. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Sara J. Morgan,et al.  The effects of a concurrent task on walking in persons with transfemoral amputation compared to persons without limb loss , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  Katheryn J Allyn,et al.  Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Grace Campbell,et al.  Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  C. Blake,et al.  The effect of a dual task on gait speed in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Gait & posture.