Differentiating Social and Personal Power: Opposite Effects on Stereotyping, but Parallel Effects on Behavioral Approach Tendencies

How does power affect behavior? We posit that this depends on the type of power. We distinguish between social power (power over other people) and personal power (freedom from other people) and argue that these two types of power have opposite associations with independence and interdependence. We propose that when the distinction between independence and interdependence is relevant, social power and personal power will have opposite effects; however, they will have parallel effects when the distinction is irrelevant. In two studies (an experimental study and a large field study), we demonstrate this by showing that social power and personal power have opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach.

[1]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  Power, Culture, and Action: Considerations in the Expression and Enactment of Power in East Asian and Western Societies , 2006 .

[2]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[3]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Marius van Dijke,et al.  Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics , 2006 .

[5]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[7]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[8]  Kai Sassenberg,et al.  Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .

[10]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  Effect of values on perception and decision making: A study of alternative work values measures. , 1987 .

[12]  J. Meloy,et al.  Physical Safety and Security: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators of Violence , 2007 .

[13]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[14]  John A Bargh,et al.  NONCONSCIOUS EFFECTS OF POWER ON BASIC APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES. , 2008, Social cognition.

[15]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Does power corrupt? , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach , 2008, Psychological science.

[17]  C. Butler,et al.  Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact , 1999 .

[18]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[19]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[20]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  M. Brauer,et al.  Social power , 2006 .

[22]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[23]  Bertrand Russell,et al.  Power: A New Social Analysis , 1938 .

[24]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context , 1996 .

[26]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[27]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Implicit Stereotyping in Person Judgment. , 1993 .

[28]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[29]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[31]  S. Cross,et al.  The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .

[33]  D. Stapel,et al.  When We Wonder What it all Means: Interpretation Goals Facilitate Accessibility and Stereotyping Effects , 2001 .

[34]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[35]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A. Kiefer,et al.  Power and Impression Formation: The Effects of Power on the Desire for Morality and Competence Information , 2004 .

[37]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Sociological theory and modern society , 1968 .