Foot-and-mouth disease: measurements of aerosol emission from pigs as a function of virus strain and initial dose.

Measurements of airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus have been made using 20 pigs that had either O UKG or C Noville injected into their heel-pads to determine if the kinetics of virus emission are related to the virus strain and dose administered in the challenge inoculum. Viable virus was detected in aerosol emissions for 3 days regardless of the strain or dose of virus given. No correlation was found between the peak level of virus emission and dose, but pigs infected with a lower dose of virus had a delayed onset of aerosol emission and emitted a greater total amount of aerosolised virus. Irrespective of the dose, both the total amount and the peak level of virus emission were higher from pigs infected with C Noville compared to those infected with O UKG. The results suggest that care should be taken when extrapolating from laboratory derived data to the field; this is particularly the case in the early days of an outbreak when the aerosol characteristics of the virus involved may be unknown and the amount of virus that an individual animal has been challenged with remains uncertain.

[1]  J Gloster,et al.  Use of prediction models to forecast and analyse airborne spread during the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Brittany, Jersey and the Isle of Wight in 1981 , 1982, Veterinary Record.

[2]  K. R. May,et al.  The Efficiency of Various Liquid Impinger Samplers in Bacterial Aerosols , 1957, British journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  A. Donaldson,et al.  Air sampling of pigs infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus: comparison of Litton and cyclone samplers. , 1982, Research in Veterinary Science.

[4]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Further studies to quantify the dose of natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus for pigs , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  Gavin J. S. Ross,et al.  Non-Linear Estimation , 1985, Econometric Theory.

[6]  E O Powell,et al.  A cyclone separator for aerosol sampling in the field , 1969, Journal of Hygiene.

[7]  W. Snowdon.  Growth of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Monolayer Cultures of Calf Thyroid Cells , 1966, Nature.

[8]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Determinants of early foot-and-mouth disease virus dynamics in pigs. , 2004, Journal of comparative pathology.

[9]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Studies of quantitative parameters of virus excretion and transmission in pigs and cattle experimentally infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 2003, Journal of comparative pathology.

[10]  R. Sellers,et al.  Quantitative aspects of the spread of foot and mouth disease , 1971 .

[11]  A. Donaldson,et al.  Exposure of sheep to natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 1986, Research in veterinary science.

[12]  M. Hugh-jones,et al.  Studies on the 1967–8 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic: The relation of weather to the spread of disease , 1970, Journal of Hygiene.

[13]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Relative resistance of pigs to infection by natural aerosols of FMD virus , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[14]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, Journal of comparative pathology.