How to lead responsibly toward enhanced knowledge sharing behavior and performance: implications for human resource management

PurposeThis paper investigates the relationships between responsible leadership and employees' knowledge sharing behavior and performance in the healthcare sector. The present study provides deeper insights into those relationships by uncovering the mechanisms through which relational and ethical dimensions of responsible leadership influence knowledge sharing outcomes. Drawing on the social exchange theory, this study examines the mediating role of trust in the leader and leadership support.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 445 healthcare professionals in Pakistan. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the data.FindingsThe study findings revealed that responsible leaders enhance knowledge worker performance and knowledge sharing behavior through enhancing trusting relationships with followers and providing support. Furthermore, the authors investigated the moderating role of goal orientation, and the results showed that the effect of responsible leadership on knowledge worker performance was stronger for highly goal-oriented employees.Practical implicationsThis research suggests that human resource managers interested in fostering knowledge sharing behaviors, must focus on cultivating responsible leadership behavior within their organizations. Furthermore, this study findings propose that HRM practices should foster employee goal orientation in order to enhance knowledge workers' performance.Originality/valueThis study makes a novel contribution to the literature by shifting the research focus from the traditional view of leadership to a leadership style more responsive to the reciprocity nature of the relationships between employees and leaders. By shifting the focus to a relational-ethical based leadership style, the current study was able to fully uncover the underlying mechanisms linking responsible leadership to knowledge sharing outcomes.

[1]  Shohei Hayashi,et al.  Inclusive leadership and knowledge sharing in Japanese workplaces: the role of diversity in the biological sex of workplace personnel , 2022, Personnel Review.

[2]  Leila Afshari,et al.  But I've got my powers: Examining a moderated mediation model of punitive supervision, work alienation and well-being in hospitality industry , 2022, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.

[3]  R. Agrawal,et al.  It's a knowledge centric world! Does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? Psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator , 2022, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Jinyun Duan,et al.  Great leaders do everything: a moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, trust in leader, helping behaviour, and idiosyncratic deals , 2022, Asian Business & Management.

[5]  Ahmad Said,et al.  The impacts of project complexity, trust in leader, performance readiness and situational leadership on financial sustainability , 2022, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

[6]  Phuong tra Tran,et al.  An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[7]  Leila Afshari.  Identification through meaning-making: identity enactment towards organizational commitment , 2021, Human Resource Development International.

[8]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Communal solidarity in extreme environments: The role of servant leadership and social resources in building serving culture and service performance , 2021 .

[9]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  How are you Sleeping? Leadership Support, Sleep Health, and Work-Relevant Outcomes , 2021, Occupational Health Science.

[10]  A. Ishizaka,et al.  Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach , 2021, Journal of Business Research.

[11]  Bojan Obrenovic,et al.  Personality trait of conscientiousness impact on tacit knowledge sharing: the mediating effect of eagerness and subjective norm , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Masduki Asbari,et al.  THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP IN INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: TRANSACTIONAL VERSUS TRANSFORMATIONAL STYLE , 2021, JIMFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi).

[13]  Nicola M. Pless,et al.  Responsible Leadership and the Reflective CEO: Resolving Stakeholder Conflict by Imagining What Could be done , 2021, Journal of Business Ethics.

[14]  A. Purwanto,et al.  EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING ON MARKET PERFORMANCE OF INDONESIAN CONSUMER GOODS COMPANY , 2021 .

[15]  Amlan Haque,et al.  Responsible leadership and employee outcomes: a systematic literature review, integration and propositions , 2021 .

[16]  P. Le,et al.  Determinants of radical and incremental innovation: the influence of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and knowledge-centered culture , 2021 .

[17]  R. Priyadarshini,et al.  Responsible Leadership: A New Paradigm for Organizational Sustainability , 2021, Management and Labour Studies.

[18]  T. Bartram,et al.  Multicultural skills in open innovation: relational leadership enabling knowledge sourcing and sharing , 2021 .

[19]  W. Abdul,et al.  Empirical Investigation on the Effects of Culture on Knowledge Sharing and Organization Citizenship Behaviour: Study from UAE , 2021, Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

[20]  Yang Chen,et al.  CEO environmentally responsible leadership and firm environmental innovation: A socio-psychological perspective , 2021 .

[21]  Influence of Transactional Leadership and Trust in Leader on Employee Well-being and Mediating role of Organizational Climate , 2021, International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs.

[22]  Leila Afshari.  Idealized influence and commitment: a granular approach in understanding leadership , 2021 .

[23]  Amlan Haque.  The COVID-19 pandemic and the role of responsible leadership in health care: thinking beyond employee well-being and organisational sustainability. , 2021, Leadership in health services.

[24]  Raheel Yasin,et al.  Responsible leadership and employees' turnover intention. Explore the mediating roles of ethical climate and corporate image , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  B. Choi,et al.  When career success enhances employees' life satisfaction: different effects of two types of goal orientations , 2020 .

[26]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  The effects of responsible leadership and knowledge sharing on job performance among knowledge workers , 2020 .

[27]  Leila Afshari,et al.  Organizational commitment: exploring the role of identity , 2019 .

[28]  Ali Hadian Nasab,et al.  Authentic leadership and employee performance: mediating role of organizational commitment , 2019, Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

[29]  Jiang Hu,et al.  Detecting Common Method Bias: Performance of the Harman's Single-Factor Test , 2019, DATB.

[30]  Syed Muhammad Shariq,et al.  Mediating and moderating impact of goal orientation and emotional intelligence on the relationship of knowledge oriented leadership and knowledge sharing , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Hongdan Zhao,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Responsible Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Leadership Identity Perspective , 2019, Sustainability.

[32]  Amlan Haque,et al.  Responsible leadership, affective commitment and intention to quit: an individual level analysis , 2019, Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

[33]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[34]  T. Nguyen,et al.  How knowledge sharing connects interpersonal trust and innovation capability , 2019, Chinese Management Studies.

[35]  Michel Zaitouni,et al.  The impacts of leadership support and coworker support on employee creative behavior , 2018, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

[36]  Yuqiang Feng,et al.  The impact of psychological climate on employees’ innovative use of information systems: The moderating role of goal orientation , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Lei Hui,et al.  How leadership and trust in leaders foster employees’ behavior toward knowledge sharing , 2018 .

[38]  Tânia M. G. Marques,et al.  Responsible Leadership Research: A Bibliometric Review , 2018 .

[39]  M. Rawwas,et al.  Ethical leadership, trust in leader and creativity: The mediated mechanism and an interacting effect , 2018, Journal of Management & Organization.

[40]  Minhong Wang,et al.  Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[41]  Junqi Shi,et al.  Linking Ethical Leadership to Employee Burnout, Workplace Deviance and Performance: Testing the Mediating Roles of Trust in Leader and Surface Acting , 2017 .

[42]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Supervisory orientation, employee goal orientation, and knowledge management among front line hotel employees. , 2017 .

[43]  Thurasamy Ramayah,et al.  Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods , 2017 .

[44]  Jisung Park,et al.  Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Creativity: The Role of Chief Executive Officer's Learning Goal Orientation , 2015 .

[45]  Jonathan P. Doh,et al.  Responsible Leadership Helps Retain Talent in India , 2011 .

[46]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes , 2010 .

[47]  Nicola M. Pless,et al.  Business Leaders as Citizens of the World. Advancing Humanism on a Global Scale , 2009 .

[48]  Thomas Maak,et al.  Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital , 2007 .

[49]  Michael E. Brown,et al.  Ethical leadership: A review and future directions , 2006 .

[50]  Jodie B. Ullman,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Reviewing the Basics and Moving Forward , 2006, Journal of personality assessment.

[51]  Thomas Maak,et al.  Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective , 2006 .

[52]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  A. Stone,et al.  Transformational versus servant leadership: a difference in leader focus , 2004 .

[54]  M. Griffin,et al.  Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions , 2004 .

[55]  M. Ipe.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[56]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[57]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling , 1994 .

[58]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[59]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[60]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[61]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[63]  C. Dweck.  The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. , 1975 .

[64]  A Bandura,et al.  Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[66]  Herson Keradjaan,et al.  The Effect of Servant Leadership on Lecturer Performance Through Trust in Leader as A Mediation Variable , 2020 .

[67]  Bilal Afsar,et al.  Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control , 2019, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[68]  Azrain Nasyrah Mustapa,et al.  Knowledge management and job performance in the public sector: The moderating role of organizational commitment , 2016 .

[69]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[70]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[71]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics , 2010 .

[72]  B. Avolio,et al.  . , 2005, The Leadership Quarterly.

[73]  Leila Afshari,et al.  Why Culture matters to Leadership, Motivation, and Willing Organizational Commitment? , 2005 .

[74]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[75]  Ralph M. Stogdill,et al.  Leadership, membership and organization , 1950 .