Digi-HTA: Health technology assessment framework for digital healthcare services

Health technology assessment (HTA) refers to the systematic evaluation of the properties, effects, and/or impacts of health technology. The main purpose of the assessment is to inform decisionmakers in order to better support the introduction of new health technologies. New digital healthcare solutions like mHealth, artificial intelligence (AI), and robotics have brought with them a great potential to further develop healthcare services, but their introduction should follow the same criteria as that of other healthcare methods. They must provide evidence-based benefits and be safe to use, and their impacts on patients and organizations need to be clarified. The first objective of this study was to describe the state-of-the-art HTA methods for mHealth, AI, and robotics. The second objective of this study was to evaluate the domains needed in the assessment. The final aim was to develop an HTA framework for digital healthcare services to support the introduction of novel technologies into Finnish healthcare. In this study, the state-of-the-art HTA methods were evaluated using a literature review and interviews. It was noted that some good practices already existed, but the overall picture showed that further development is still needed, especially in the AI and robotics fields. With the cooperation of professionals, key aspects and domains that should be taken into account to make fast but comprehensive assessments were identified. Based on this information, we created a new framework which supports the HTA process for digital healthcare services. The framework was named Digi-HTA.

[1]  Michel Rousseau,et al.  Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: Testing an integrated theoretical model , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  Torsten Gruchmann,et al.  The Effect of New Standards on the Global Movement Toward Usable Medical Devices , 2007, USAB.

[3]  Carme Carrion,et al.  mHealth Assessment: conceptualization of a global framework , 2016 .

[4]  Isabel de la Torre Díez,et al.  Privacy and Security in Mobile Health Apps: A Review and Recommendations , 2014, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Kristian Lampe,et al.  IS THE EUNETHTA HTA CORE MODEL® FIT FOR PURPOSE? EVALUATION FROM AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE , 2018, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  Pericle Salvini,et al.  RoboLaw: Towards a European framework for robotics regulation , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Vivian Ng,et al.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment. , 2017, Ontario health technology assessment series.

[8]  Jarmo Reponen,et al.  Testing of the assisting software for radiologists analysing head CT images: lessons learned , 2017, BMC Medical Imaging.

[9]  Magdalena Ruth Moshi,et al.  SUITABILITY OF CURRENT EVALUATION FRAMEWORKS FOR USE IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MOBILE MEDICAL APPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW , 2018, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  S. Maeso,et al.  Meta‐analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  Kari Harno UUMA. Regional eHealth services in the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS). , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[12]  J Reponen,et al.  Initial experience with a wireless personal digital assistant as a teleradiology terminal for reporting emergency computerized tomography scans , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  Fabrizio Bert,et al.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A minihealth technology assessment in a teaching hospital , 2012 .

[14]  Pekka Ruotsalainen,et al.  Sharable EHR systems in Finland. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  Roberto Miniati,et al.  Integrated HTA-FMEA/FMECA methodology for the evaluation of robotic system in urology and general surgery. , 2016, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[16]  Robert Koprowski,et al.  Machine learning, medical diagnosis, and biomedical engineering research - commentary , 2014, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[17]  Walter Ricciardi,et al.  HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE ON E-HEALTH/M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES: EVALUATING THE TRANSPARENCY AND THOROUGHNESS , 2018, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  Robert S H Istepanian,et al.  m-Health 2.0: New perspectives on mobile health, machine learning and big data analytics. , 2018, Methods.

[19]  Ren C. Luo,et al.  Topological Map Generation for Intrinsic Visual Navigation of an Intelligent Service Robot , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[20]  Robert S. H. Istepanian,et al.  Emerging mobile communication technologies for health: some imperative notes on m-health , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[21]  Simo Saarakkala,et al.  Automatic Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep Learning-Based Approach , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  E. Fosch Villaronga,et al.  European regulatory framework for person carrier robots , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[23]  Jarmo Reponen,et al.  Current status of national eHealth and telemedicine development in Finland. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[24]  Eduard Fosch Villaronga,et al.  The Progressive Intertwinement Between Design, Human Needs and the Regulation of Care Technology: The Case of Lower-Limb Exoskeletons , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  PMD167 - HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MOBILE HEALTH APPLICATIONS: SLOW PROGRESS IN A FAST-PACED INDUSTRY? , 2018, Value in Health.

[26]  Hannu Lehtinen,et al.  Robotics in Care Services : A Finnish Roadmap , 2017 .

[27]  Begoña García Zapirain,et al.  Security Recommendations for mHealth Apps: Elaboration of a Developer’s Guide , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[28]  Yukinori Kobayashi,et al.  An intelligent docking station manager for multiple mobile service robots , 2015, 2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS).

[29]  Päivi Hämäläinen,et al.  Tieto- ja viestintäteknologian käyttö terveydenhuollossa vuonna 2011 : Tilanne ja kehityksen suunta , 2012 .

[30]  M. Shamim Hossain,et al.  Healthcare Big Data Voice Pathology Assessment Framework , 2016, IEEE Access.

[31]  Sari Palojoki,et al.  Health information systems' usability-related use errors in patient safety incidents , 2017 .

[32]  Hannah Wood,et al.  The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment , 2018, PharmacoEconomics.

[33]  Reinhard Busse,et al.  Health technology assessment at age 25-Squaring the circle of strong methodology and context-dependency? , 2019, Health policy.

[34]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[35]  Jennifer Zelmer,et al.  An Assessment Framework for e-Mental Health Apps in Canada: Results of a Modified Delphi Process , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[36]  Chris Henshall,et al.  HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, VALUE-BASED DECISION MAKING, AND INNOVATION , 2013, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[37]  J. Reponen,et al.  Extending a multimedia medical record to a regional service with electronic referral and discharge letters , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[38]  Martti Teikari,et al.  Menetelmien arviointi terveydenhuollossa , 2007 .