Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method

Abstract Earthquakes represent one of the major threats to the stability of the world architectural heritage, which is mostly constituted by unreinforced masonry (URM) structures. The dynamic behavior of these structures is complex and highly non-linear, as it involves sliding and rocking of the component blocks. As a result, numerical modeling seems to be the most appropriate predictive approach and, in particular, the Discrete Element Method (DEM) has recently emerged as a very promising tool for this purpose. Although multi-drum columns and arches on buttresses are typical components of historic URM structures, their modeling with the DEM has been the subject of relatively limited research. Moreover, a set of input parameters is required for the definition of the numerical model and, due to the uncertainty and difficulty in their experimental evaluation, these parameters are usually set in an arbitrary way. In this paper, a systematic parametric study based on the DEM is adopted to evaluate the dynamic behavior and resistance of multi-drum columns and arches on buttresses subjected to two different base motions, i.e. step and harmonic impulses. A detailed investigation on failure domains and modes of collapse is presented. The main features of the dynamic response of masonry structures and the sensitivity of the response to changes in the excitation, geometry and mechanical parameters are discussed.

[1]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Rocking Stability of Masonry Arches in Seismic Regions , 2008 .

[2]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations , 2000 .

[3]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Seismic assessment strategies for masonry structures , 2009 .

[4]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns , 2005 .

[5]  John Ochsendorf,et al.  Collapse of masonry structures , 2002 .

[6]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : NUMERICAL METHODS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS K.-J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1978 .

[7]  José V. Lemos,et al.  Numerical study of the seismic behaviour of a part of the Parthenon Pronaos , 2003 .

[8]  Chris J. Pearce,et al.  Discontinuous modelling of masonry bridges , 2003 .

[9]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Analysis of vaulted masonry structures subjected to horizontal ground motion , 2006 .

[10]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Response of rigid body assemblies to dynamic excitation , 1995 .

[11]  C. Papantonopoulos The Earthquake Resistance of Ancient Columns: A Numerical Perspective Developed at the Classical Temple of Apollo Epikourios. , 1997 .

[12]  P. Komodromos,et al.  Planar investigation of the seismic response of ancient columns and colonnades with epistyles using a custom-made software , 2009 .

[13]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  The Impact of High-Frequency/ Low-Energy Seismic Waves on Unreinforced Masonry , 2007 .

[14]  Edward L. Wilson,et al.  Numerical methods in finite element analysis , 1976 .

[15]  J. Lemos,et al.  Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method , 2002 .

[16]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  On the dynamics of rocking motion of single rigid‐block structures , 2007 .

[17]  Rossana Dimitri,et al.  Structural study of masonry buttresses: the trapezoidal form , 2012 .

[18]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Failure of masonry arches under impulse base motion , 2007 .

[19]  P. Polycarpou,et al.  Simulation of the response of ancient columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations , 2008 .

[20]  Elena Mele,et al.  A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches , 2004 .

[21]  Rossana Dimitri,et al.  Structural study of masonry buttresses: the stepped form , 2012 .

[22]  G. Housner The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .