Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: Twenty years of experience. Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert group “Environment”

The explosion on 26 April 1986 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, which is located 100 km from Kiev in Ukraine (at that time part of the USSR), and the consequent reactor fire, which lasted for 10 days, resulted in an unprecedented release of radioactive material from a nuclear reactor and adverse consequences for the public and the environment. The resulting contamination of the environment with radioactive material caused the evacuation of more than 100 000 people from the affected region during 1986 and the relocation, after 1986, of another 200 000 people from Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Some five million people continue to live in areas contaminated by the accident. The national governments of the three affected countries, supported by international organizations, have undertaken costly efforts to remediate the areas affected by the contamination, provide medical services and restore the region’s social and economic well-being. The accident’s consequences were not limited to the territories of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, since other European countries were also affected as a result of the atmospheric transfer of radioactive material. These countries also encountered problems in the radiation protection of their populations, but to a lesser extent than the three most affected countries. Although the accident occurred nearly two decades ago, controversy still surrounds the real impact of the disaster. Therefore the IAEA, in cooperation with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank, as well as the competent authorities of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, established the Chernobyl Forum in 2003. The mission of the Forum was — through a series of managerial and expert meetings — to generate “authoritative consensual statements” on the environmental consequences and health effects attributable to radiation exposure arising from the accident, as well as to provide advice on environmental remediation and special health care programmes, and to suggest areas in which further research is required. The Forum was created as a contribution to the United Nations’ ten year strategy for Chernobyl, launched in 2002 with the publication of Human Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident — A Strategy for Recovery. Over a two year period, two groups of experts from 12 countries, including Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, and from relevant international organizations, assessed the accident’s environmental and health consequences. In early 2005 the Expert Group ‘Environment’, coordinated by the IAEA, and the Expert Group ‘Health’, coordinated by the WHO, presented their reports for the consideration of the Chernobyl Forum. Both reports were considered and approved by the Forum at its meeting on 18–20 April 2005. This meeting also decided, inter alia, “to consider the approved reports… as a common position of the Forum members, i.e., of the eight United Nations organizations and the three most affected countries, regarding the environmental and health consequences of the Chernobyl accident, as well as recommended future actions, i.e., as a consensus within the United Nations system.” This report presents the findings and recommendations of the Chernobyl Forum concerning the environmental effects of the Chernobyl accident. The Forum’s report considering the health effects of the Chernobyl accident is being published by the WHO. The Expert Group ‘Environment’ was chaired by L. Anspaugh of the United States of America. The IAEA technical officer responsible for this report was M. Balonov of the IAEA Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety

[1]  D. Taylor,et al.  Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1996 .

[2]  M. Pomerantseva,et al.  Genetic disorders in house mouse germ cells after the Chernobyl catastrophe. , 1997, Mutation research.

[3]  V. Bar'yakhtar Comprehensive risk assessment of the consequences of the Chornobyl accident , 1998 .

[4]  F A Tikhomirov,et al.  Main investigation results on the forest radioecology in the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accident zones. , 1994, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  G. Pröhl,et al.  A CONSISTENT RADIONUCLIDE VECTOR AFTER THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT , 2002, Health physics.

[6]  S. Fesenko,et al.  Remediation strategies for rural territories contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[7]  Ilya A Likhtarev,et al.  Ukrainian thyroid doses after the Chernobyl accident. , 1993, Health physics.

[8]  G. Bock,et al.  Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides , 1997 .

[9]  R. Chesser,et al.  The chornobyl nuclear disaster and subsequent creation of a wildlife preserve , 2000 .

[10]  K Hove,et al.  Chemical methods for reduction of the transfer of radionuclides to farm animals in semi-natural environments. , 1993, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  V. Kashparov,et al.  Territory contamination with the radionuclides representing the fuel component of Chernobyl fallout. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  M. Balonov,et al.  Contributions of short-lived radioiodines to thyroid doses received by evacuees from the Chernobyl area estimated using early in vivo activity measurements. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Y E Dubrova,et al.  Stage specificity, dose response, and doubling dose for mouse minisatellite germ-line mutation induced by acute radiation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. S. Prister,et al.  Countermeasures used in the Ukraine to produce forage and animal food products with radionuclide levels below intervention limits after the Chernobyl accident , 1993 .

[15]  Optimization and decision-making in radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. , 1989, Annals of the ICRP.

[16]  Modelling of Radionuclide Transport in the Set of River Reservoirs , 1994 .

[17]  G. Pröhl,et al.  A radioecological model for thyroid dose reconstruction of the Belarus population following the Chernobyl accident , 2004, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[18]  Michael H. Repacholi,et al.  Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes , 2006 .

[19]  S. Levchuk,et al.  Soil- and plant-based countermeasures to reduce 137Cs and 90Sr uptake by grasses in natural meadows: the REDUP project. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[20]  Luigi Monte,et al.  Evaluation of radionuclide transfer functions from drainage basins of fresh water systems , 1995 .

[21]  Victor A. Poyarkov,et al.  The Chornobyl Accident: A Comprehensive Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[22]  M. Pomerantseva,et al.  Genetic disorders in mice exposed to radiation in the vicinity of the Chernobyl nuclear power station. , 1992, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  Chernobyl accident: reconstruction of thyroid dose for inhabitants of the Republic of Belarus. , 1999, Health physics.

[24]  P. Jensen Shielding factors for gamma radiation from activity deposited on structures and ground surfaces , 1985 .

[25]  F. J. Sandalls,et al.  Hot particles from Chernobyl: A review , 1993 .

[26]  N. Arkhipov,et al.  Acute and long-term effects of irradiation on pine (Pinus silvestris) stands post-Chernobyl , 1994 .

[27]  K. Hove,et al.  Reduction of Radiocesium Transfer to Animal Products Using Sustained Release Boli with Ammoniumiron(III)-Hexacyanoferrate(II) , 1993, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[28]  Neil M.J. Crout,et al.  Dynamic distribution of radioisotopes of cerium, ruthenium and silver in sheep tissues , 1998 .

[29]  Luigi Monte,et al.  Global analysis of the riverine transport of 90Sr and 37Cs. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  F. W. Whicker,et al.  Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Terrestrial Plant Communities , 1974 .

[32]  M. Balonov,et al.  External exposure of the population living in areas of Russia contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident , 2002, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[33]  O. Guillitte,et al.  An assessment of experimental and potential countermeasures to reduce radionuclide transfers in forest ecosystems , 1993 .

[34]  Nikolai Tsarik Supplying Water and Treating Sewage in Kiev After the Chernobyl Accident , 1993 .

[35]  N. Sanzharova,et al.  Countermeasures on Natural and Agricultural Areas after Chernobyl Accident , 2002 .

[36]  B. Bridges Radiation and Germline Mutation at Repeat Sequences: Are We in the Middle of a Paradigm Shift? , 2001, Radiation research.

[37]  I. Ferris,et al.  Fifty Years of Radiation Biology in Entomology: Lessons Learned from IDIDAS , 2005 .

[38]  O. Fedorenko,et al.  Genetic consequences of radioactive contamination for populations of Arabidopsis. , 1992, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  G. Pröhl,et al.  Internal exposure from the ingestion of foods contaminated by 137Cs after the Chernobyl accident--report 2. Ingestion doses of the rural population of Ukraine up to 12 y after the accident (1986-1997). , 2000, Health physics.

[40]  V. Berkovsky,et al.  Present thoughts on the aquatic countermeasures applied to regions of the Dnieper river catchment contaminated by the 1986 Chernobyl accident , 1997 .

[41]  V. Chumak,et al.  Monitoring of Individual Doses of Populations Residing in the Territories Contaminated after Chernobyl Accident , 1999 .

[42]  D. Bugai,et al.  Risks from radionuclide migration to groundwater in the Chernobyl 30-km zone. , 1996, Health physics.

[43]  N. Beresford,et al.  The transfer of 73As, 109Cd and 203Hg to the milk and tissues of dairy cattle , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[44]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[45]  R. Baker,et al.  Small mammals from the most radioactive sites near the chornobyl nuclear power plant , 1996 .

[46]  J. T. Smith,et al.  A critical review of measures to reduce radioactive doses from drinking water and consumption of freshwater foodstuffs. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[47]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Gamma Exposures due to Radionuclides Deposited in Urban Environments. Part I: Kerma Rates from Contaminated Urban Surfaces , 1988 .

[48]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Effective doses due to external irradiation from the Chernobyl accident for different population groups of Ukraine. , 1996, Health physics.

[49]  Vladimir Novokshchenov,et al.  The Chernobyl Problem , 2002 .

[50]  I. F. Vovk,et al.  Technical approaches to decontamination of terrestrial environments in the CIS (former USSR) , 1993 .

[51]  R. Avila,et al.  Quantitative assessment of radiocaesium bioavailability in forest soils , 2000 .

[52]  A. Aarkrog,et al.  Consequences of the Chernobyl accident for the natural and human environments , 1996 .

[53]  E. Scott The Atlas of Caesium Deposition on Europe after the Chernobyl Accident , 2001 .

[54]  L. Håkanson,et al.  Remedial measures against radioactive Caesium in Swedish lake fish after Chernobyl , 1992, Aquatic Sciences.

[55]  M. Balonov,et al.  Model validation for external doses due to environmental contaminations by the Chernobyl accident. , 1999, Health physics.

[56]  R. Saxén,et al.  Discharge of 137Cs and 90Sr by Finnish rivers to the Baltic Sea in 1986-1996. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[57]  P. Santschi,et al.  The self-cleaning capacity of surface waters after radioactive fallout. Evidence from European waters after Chernobyl, 1986-1988 , 1990 .

[58]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  INDIVIDUAL THYROID DOSE ESTIMATION FOR A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CHERNOBYL-RELATED THYROID CANCER AMONG CHILDREN OF BELARUS—PART I: 131I, SHORT-LIVED RADIOIODINES (132I, 133I, 135I), AND SHORT-LIVED RADIOTELLURIUMS (131MTe AND 132Te) , 2004, Health physics.

[59]  V. B. Chumichev,et al.  Cesium-137 and strontium-90 contamination of water bodies in the areas affected by releases from the chernobyl nuclear power plant accident: an overview , 1994 .

[60]  G. Millward,et al.  Activity Concentrations and Fluxes of Radiocesium in the Southern Baltic Sea , 2001 .

[61]  Harri Toivonen,et al.  Transport of radioactive particles from the chernobyl accident , 1997 .

[62]  G. Voigt,et al.  Post-Chornobyl Thyroid Cancers in Ukraine. Report 1: Estimation of Thyroid Doses , 2005, Radiation research.

[63]  K. Dohi,et al.  Dose-response of a radiation induction of a germline mutation at a hypervariable mouse minisatellite locus. , 1995, International journal of radiation biology.

[64]  D. Copplestone,et al.  Effects of chronic radiation exposure on small mammals in the Chernobyl exclusion zone , 2004 .

[65]  M. Goldman Retrospective Assessment of Exposures to Ionizing Radiation , 2004 .

[66]  S. A. Geraskin,et al.  Genetic consequences of radioactive contamination by the Chernobyl fallout to agricultural crops. , 2003, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[67]  Mark J. Zheleznyak,et al.  Simulation of Countermeasures to Diminish Radionuclide Fluxes from the Chernobyl Zone via Aquatic Pathways , 1997 .

[68]  G. Kelly,et al.  Radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident , 1996 .

[69]  P. Jacob,et al.  Measurements after the Chernobyl accident in relation to the exposure of an urban population. , 2000 .

[70]  T Schneider,et al.  Chernobyl post-accident management: the ETHOS project. , 1999, Health physics.

[71]  H. A. Das,et al.  Mobilization of radiocaesium in pore water of lake sediments , 1989, Nature.

[72]  Brenda J. Howard,et al.  Nordic Radioecology. The transfer of radionuclides through Nordic ecosystems to man , 1995 .

[73]  V. Vallejo,et al.  137Cs and 90Sr root uptake prediction under close-to-real controlled conditions , 1999 .

[74]  S Sundell-Bergman,et al.  Effects of ionising radiation exposure on plants, fish and mammals: relevant data for environmental radiation protection , 2004, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[75]  I︠u︡. A. Izraėlʹ Radioactive fallout after nuclear explosions and accidents , 2002 .

[76]  A. Sparrow,et al.  Correlation of Nuclear Volume and DNA Content with Higher Plant Tolerance to Chronic Radiation , 1961, Science.

[77]  R. M. Alexakhin,et al.  Countermeasures in agricultural production as an effective means of mitigating the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident , 1993 .

[78]  B. M. Durst,et al.  Conceptual Design of the Chornobyl New Safe Confinement - an Overview , 2006 .

[79]  Jørn Roed,et al.  Practical means for decontamination 9 years after a nuclear accident , 1995 .

[80]  P. Jacob,et al.  Gamma Exposures due to Radionuclides Deposited in Urban Environments. Part II: Location Factors for Different Deposition Patterns , 1988 .

[81]  G. Pretzsch,et al.  Radiological consequences of a hypothetical ''roof breakdown'' accident of the Chernobyl sarcophagus , 1997 .

[82]  Lake fish as the main contributor of internal dose to lakeshore residents in the Chernobyl contaminated area. , 2004, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[83]  V. Shevchenko,et al.  The mutation frequency of Drosophila melanogaster populations living under conditions of increased background radiation due to the Chernobyl accident. , 1992, The Science of the total environment.

[84]  V. Sidorov,et al.  Forests and forestry: radiation protection measures with special reference to the Chernobyl accident zone. , 1993, The Science of the total environment.

[85]  I. Kryshev Radioactive contamination of aquatic ecosystems following the Chernobyl accident , 1995 .

[86]  Francis R. Livens,et al.  Retention of radioactive caesium by different soils in the catchment of a small lake , 1993 .

[87]  K Hove,et al.  Countermeasures for radiocesium in animal products in Norway after the Chernobyl accident--techniques, effectiveness, and costs. , 1996, Health physics.

[88]  K Hove,et al.  The use of hexacyanoferrates in different forms to reduce radiocaesium contamination of animal products in Russia. , 1998, The Science of the total environment.

[89]  Gabriele Voigt,et al.  Sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated rural, urban and industrial ecosystems , 2002 .

[90]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT: RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ESTIMATES OF EXTERNAL DOSE OF THE POPULATION OF UKRAINE , 2002, Health physics.

[91]  Ellen-Marie Forsberg,et al.  An ethical dimension to sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated areas. , 2004, Journal of environmental radioactivity.