Water vapour profiles by ground-based FTIR spectroscopy: study for an optimised retrieval and its validation

The sensitivity of ground-based instruments mea- suring in the infrared with respect to tropospheric water vapour content is generally limited to the lower and mid- dle troposphere. The large vertical gradients and variabili- ties avoid a better sensitivity for the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UT/LS) region. In this work an optimised re- trieval is presented and it is demonstrated that compared to a commonly applied method, it improves the performance of the FTIR technique. The reasons for this improvement and the possible deficiencies of the method are discussed. Only by applying the method proposed here and using measure- ments performed at mountain observatories can water vapour variabilities in the UT/LS be detected in a self-consistent manner. The precision, expressed as noise to signal ratio, is estimated at 45%. In the middle and lower troposphere, precisions of 22% are achieved. These estimations are con- firmed by a comparison of retrieval results based on real FTIR measurements with coinciding measurements of syn- optical meteorological radiosondes.

[1]  Laurence S. Rothman,et al.  The HITRAN molecular spectroscopic database: edition of 2000 including updates through 2001 , 2003 .

[2]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[3]  Holger Vömel,et al.  Characterization and correction of relative humidity measurements from Vaisala RS80-A radiosondes at cold temperatures , 2001 .

[4]  T. Blumenstock,et al.  Analysis of the instrumental line shape of high-resolution fourier transform IR spectrometers with gas cell measurements and new retrieval software. , 1999, Applied optics.

[5]  Franz Schreier,et al.  Spectroscopic database for ozone in the fundamental spectral regions , 2002 .

[6]  D. Althausen,et al.  Correction Method for RS80-A Humicap Humidity Profiles and Their Validation by Lidar Backscattering Profiles in Tropical Cirrus Clouds , 2005 .

[7]  John E. Harries,et al.  Atmospheric radiation and atmospheric humidity , 1997 .

[8]  James M. Russell,et al.  SPARC assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour , 2000 .

[9]  M. Chipperfield,et al.  Subtropical trace gas profiles determined by ground-based FTIR spectroscopy at Izaña (28° N, 16° W): Five-year record, error analysis, and comparison with 3-D CTMs , 2004 .

[10]  S. Clough,et al.  Dry Bias and Variability in Vaisala RS80-H Radiosondes: The ARM Experience , 2003 .

[11]  Roy W. Spencer,et al.  How dry is the tropical free troposphere? : Implications for global warming theory , 1997 .

[12]  Daniel S. Wilks,et al.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction , 1995 .

[13]  Michael J. Kurylo,et al.  Network for the detection of stratospheric change , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  Michael Hoepfner,et al.  Karlsruhe optimized and precise radiative transfer algorithm: Part III: ADDLIN and TRANSF algorithms for modeling spectral transmittance and radiance , 1998, Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing.

[15]  Michael Hoepfner,et al.  Karlsruhe optimized and precise radiative transfer algorithm. Part I: requirements, justification, and model error estimation , 1998, Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing.

[16]  Michael Hoepfner,et al.  Karlsruhe optimized and precise radiative transfer algorithm: II. Interface to retrieval applications , 1998, Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing.

[17]  G. Braathen,et al.  NETWORK FOR THE DETECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC CHANGE , 1999 .