Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests

Abstract Allometric equations can be used to estimate the biomass and carbon stock of forests. However, so far the equations for Dipterocarp forests have not been developed in sufficient detail. In this research, allometric equations are presented based on the genera of commercial species and mixed species. Separate equations are developed for the Dipterocarpus, Hopea, Palaquium and Shorea genera, and an equation of a mix of these genera represents commercial species. The mixed species is constructed from commercial and non-commercial species. The data were collected in lowland mixed Dipterocarp forests in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The number of trees sampled in this research was 122, with diameters (1.30 m or above buttresses) ranging from 6 to 200 cm. Destructive sampling was used to collect the samples where diameter at breast height (DBH), commercial bole height (CBH), and wood density were used as predictors for dry weight of total above-ground biomass (TAGB). Model comparison and selection were based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), slope coefficient of the regression, average deviation, confidence interval (CI) of the mean, paired t-test. Based on these statistical indicators, the most suitable model is ln(TAGB) = c + αln(DBH). This model uses only a single predictor of DBH and produces a range of prediction values closer to the upper and lower limits of the observed mean. Model 1 is reliable for forest managers to estimate above-ground biomass, so the research findings can be extrapolated for managing forests related to carbon balance. Additional explanatory variables such as CBH do not really increase the indicators’ goodness of fit for the equation. An alternative model to incorporate wood density must be considered for estimating the above-ground biomass for mixed species. Comparing the presented equations to previously published data shows that these local species-specific and generic equations differ substantially from previously published equations and that site specific equations must be considered to get a better estimation of biomass. Based on the average deviation and the range of CI, the generalized equations are not sufficient to estimate the biomass for a certain type of forests, such as lowland Dipterocarp forests. The research findings are new for Dipterocarp forests, so they complement the previous research as well as the methodology of the Good Practice Guidance for Land Use and Land Use Change and Forestry (GPG-LULUCF).

[1]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[2]  Q. Ketterings,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests , 2001 .

[3]  Jeffrey Q. Chambers,et al.  Tree damage, allometric relationships, and above-ground net primary production in central Amazon forest , 2001 .

[4]  B. Nelson,et al.  Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon , 1999 .

[5]  M. Kanninen,et al.  Wood specific gravity and aboveground biomass of Bombacopsis quinata plantations in Costa Rica , 2002 .

[6]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Wood density in dense forest in central Amazonia, Brazil , 2005 .

[7]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Estimation of biomass in a neotropical forest of French Guiana: spatial and temporal variability , 2001, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[8]  Shilong Piao,et al.  Satellite-based estimation of biomass carbon stocks for northeast China's forests between 1982 and 1999 , 2007 .

[9]  H. Ogawa,et al.  Aboveground biomass of tropical rain forest stands in Indonesian Borneo , 1986, Vegetatio.

[10]  Marco Bindi,et al.  Modelling carbon budget of Mediterranean forests using ground and remote sensing measurements , 2005 .

[11]  J. Hellin,et al.  Wood Biomass Estimation of Central American Dry Zone Species , 1992 .

[12]  弘彦 森田.  Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) , 2002 .

[13]  C. Hall,et al.  Modeling the spatial and temporal variability in climate and primary productivity across the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico , 2003 .

[14]  J. Kim,et al.  Allometry and biomass of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) in central Korea. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Takeshi Tange,et al.  Changes in carbon storage in fallow forests in the tropical lowlands of Borneo , 2000 .

[16]  Niro Higuchi,et al.  Comparison of formulae for biomass content determination in a tropical rain forest site in the state of Pará, Brazil , 1999 .

[17]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[18]  W. B. Smith,et al.  Evaluating allometric shrub biomass equations fit to generated data , 1985 .

[19]  M. Duggin,et al.  A temporal analysis of urban forest carbon storage using remote sensing , 2006 .

[20]  Jeffrey Q. Chambers,et al.  TROPICAL FORESTS : AN EVALUATION AND SYNTHESIS OF EXISTING FIELD DATA , 2022 .

[21]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[22]  J. Sah,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass of broadleaved woody plants in the understory of Florida Keys pine forests , 2004 .

[23]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[24]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[25]  M. Cairns,et al.  Composition and aboveground tree biomass of a dry semi-evergreen forest on Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula , 2003 .

[26]  A. Gier,et al.  A new approach to woody biomass assessment in woodlands and shrublands. , 2003 .

[27]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Correcting for Bias in Log‐Transformed Allometric Equations , 1983 .

[28]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Wood density in forests of Brazil's 'arc of deforestation': Implications for biomass and flux of carbon from land-use change in Amazonia , 2007 .

[29]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  Irvin K. Samalca,et al.  Estimation of Forest Biomass and its Error A case in Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2007 .

[31]  M. Keller,et al.  Biomass estimation in the Tapajos National Forest, Brazil: Examination of sampling and allometric uncertainties , 2001 .

[32]  A. Di Fiore,et al.  Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns inAmazonian forest biomass , 2004 .

[33]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[34]  M. Peruggia.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .