Architecture in the microcosm: biocolloids, self-assembly and pattern formation

Complex microscopic structure is a common feature in biology; the mineral shells of single–celled aquatic plants and animals such as diatoms, coccolithophores, radiolaria, the organic coatings of pollen grains and the surfaces of many seeds are all familiar examples. To the human eye, viewing this exquisite complexity, the method of construction is often far from obvious. Operating on the microscopic scale, at the size range called the colloidal dimension by synthetic chemists, is a gamut of interactions between the various components, which in many cases can lead to the formation of complex structure as an entropically favourable process. The importance of these ‘colloidal interactions’ is becoming increasingly apparent to biologists seeking the link between the genetic basis of structure and its ultimate expression. It is an emerging theme that through the evolutionary history of life, self–assembly of structure from colloidal building blocks has become integral to the process of organismal development. Colloidal interactions, however, are themselves complex. Chemists therefore tend to restrict the number and diversity of components within any system being studied in order to minimize this complexity. The interactions of spherical polystyrene particles in an aqueous or organic fluid, for example, have been well documented. The introduction of a third component into such a system clearly increases the diversity of interaction (and concomitantly, the difficulty of interpretation). Yet such a system is unrealistically simple to the biologist! The investigation of the behaviour of mixed colloidal systems is essential in the formulation of concepts regarding microscopic structural development in order to further both our understanding of biological construction, and to give rise to new developments in microscopic materials technology. Here we assess the developments in the understanding of colloidal systems in microscopic biological construction and demonstrate how these have given rise to new concepts regarding the relationships and evolution of the gene and organismal structure. We show how development of these new concepts may give rise to new materials with properties that have been tried and tested by organisms over millions of years of evolution and which, by their very nature, are more compatible with humans and their environment. We suggest how self–assembling microstructure might be used in the development of new surface coatings and drug delivery mechanisms.

[1]  J. F. Stoddart,et al.  Self-assembling wholly synthetic systems , 1996 .

[2]  Charles Tanford,et al.  The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes , 1991 .

[3]  Seth Fraden,et al.  Entropically driven microphase transitions in mixtures of colloidal rods and spheres , 1998, Nature.

[4]  E. Thomas,et al.  A MENAGERIE OF INTERFACE STRUCTURES IN COPOLYMER SYSTEMS , 1990 .

[5]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[6]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  The conformation of membranes , 1991, Nature.

[7]  P. Griffiths,et al.  Simulated Self-assembly of Spore Exines , 1998 .

[8]  M. Collinson,et al.  Sporopollenin exhibiting colloidal organization in spore walls , 1993 .

[9]  Alan R. Hemsley,et al.  The Role of Self-Assembly in Biological Systems: Evidence from Iridescent Colloidal Sporopollenin in Selaginella Megaspore Walls , 1994 .

[10]  G. J. Fleer,et al.  Polymers at Interfaces , 1993 .

[11]  Caruso,et al.  Nanoengineering of inorganic and hybrid hollow spheres by colloidal templating , 1998, Science.

[12]  D. Evans Plant Cell Biology Structure and Function , 1998 .

[13]  D. Shaw,et al.  Introduction to colloid and surface chemistry , 1970 .

[14]  H. Erbring,et al.  Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry , 1967 .

[15]  A. J. Brook,et al.  Biological minerals formed from strontium and barium sulphates. II. Crystallography and control of mineral morphology in desmids , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  J. Cowie,et al.  Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modern Materials , 1973 .

[17]  B C Goodwin,et al.  Is morphogenesis an intrinsically robust process? , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  B. Volcani,et al.  Aspects of Silicification in Wall Morphogenesis of Diatoms , 1984 .

[19]  S. Leibler,et al.  Self-organization of microtubules and motors , 1997, Nature.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Molecular self-assembly and nanochemistry: a chemical strategy for the synthesis of nanostructures. , 1991, Science.

[21]  S. Mann,et al.  Fabrication of hollow porous shells of calcium carbonate from self-organizing media , 1995, Nature.

[22]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Antichaos and adaptation. , 1991, Scientific American.

[23]  C. Perry,et al.  Crystallographic and morphological studies of the celestite skeleton of the acantharian species Phyllostaurus siculus , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  P. Bak,et al.  Self-organized criticality , 1991 .

[25]  D. Ingber The architecture of life. , 1998, Scientific American.

[26]  B. Vincent,et al.  Experimental modelling of exine self-assembly , 1996 .

[27]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[28]  A. Loxley,et al.  Preparation of Poly(methylmethacrylate) Microcapsules with Liquid Cores. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[29]  Stephen Mann,et al.  Synthesis of inorganic materials with complex form , 1996, Nature.