Susceptibility to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A study using sinus rhythm P wave parameters

Early recognition of patients at high risk for atrial fibrillation may help to minimize potential health risks. The detection of susceptibility to develop atrial fibrillation is thus a real clinical challenge. Whereas many studies have used the signal-averaged P wave, the aim of this work is to determine whether electrocardiographic parameters resulting from the analysis of the P wave in ECG recorded during sinus rhythm could be markers for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation susceptibility. Our idea was to compare the ECG in sinus rhythm from two populations: healthy people and patients subject to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In addition to standard P wave parameters (P width, P-R interval,…), the Euclidean distance between beat-to-beat P waves, which has been rarely addressed in this context, was studied on lead V1. Significant differences between the healthy and the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation groups were obtained for various parameters. Moreover, a classification of the two groups based on the joint analysis of P width and P-R interval was suggested. This proposed classification could lead to an effective identification of patients at risk to develop atrial fibrillation.

[1]  R. Erbel,et al.  Prediction of Conversion from Paroxysmal to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  Olivier Meste,et al.  Quantifying the PR Interval Pattern During Dynamic Exercise and Recovery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Dirk De Bacquer,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of p-wave characteristics for the development of atrial fibrillation in subjects aged 55 to 74 years at baseline. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  Lisa M Sullivan,et al.  P‐Wave Indices, Distribution and Quality Control Assessment (from the Framingham Heart Study) , 2010, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[5]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Altered Interatrial Conduction Detected in MADIT II Patients Bound to Develop Atrial Fibrillation , 2009, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[6]  J. Gialafos,et al.  P‐Wave Dispersion: A Novel Predictor of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation , 2001, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[7]  D H Singer,et al.  Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: relations to age and gender over nine decades. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Alberto Herreros,et al.  Exploration of Supraventricular Conduction with respect to Atrial Fibrillation. Methodological Aspects on Selected Techniques , 2005 .

[9]  Jared W. Magnani,et al.  P Wave Indices: Current Status and Future Directions in Epidemiology, Clinical, and Research Applications , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  Jean-Marc Vesin,et al.  Cancellation of Ventricular Activity in the ECG: Evaluation of Novel and Existing Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Bertil Olsson,et al.  Evolution of P‐Wave Morphology in Healthy Individuals: A 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study , 2009, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[12]  A. Bloch,et al.  Clinical study to investigate the predictive parameters for the onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension. , 2000, American heart journal.

[13]  Rolf Johansson,et al.  Analysis of changes in the beat-to-beat P-wave morphology using clustering techniques , 2009, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[14]  A. Oto,et al.  P Wave Dispersion on 12‐Lead Electrocardiography in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications , 2005 .

[16]  Hideki Hayashi,et al.  P wave and the development of atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[17]  A. Moss,et al.  Abnormal P‐Wave Morphology Is a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Development and Cardiac Death in MADIT II Patients , 2010, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[18]  O. Meste,et al.  Hysteresis analysis of the PR-PP relation under exercise conditions , 2004, Computers in Cardiology, 2004.

[19]  Ratko Magjarevic,et al.  ECG-based prediction of atrial fibrillation development following coronary artery bypass grafting , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[20]  Adriaan van Oosterom,et al.  Atrial repolarization as observable during the PQ interval. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  S. Zelenkofske,et al.  Value of the P‐Wave Signal‐Averaged ECG for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery , 1993, Circulation.

[22]  S. Sideris,et al.  Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. , 1998, American heart journal.

[23]  Randall J Lee,et al.  Increases in P-Wave Dispersion Predict Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation. , 2009, American heart journal.