Are Reliability, Reproducibility and Validity the Correct Terms to Assess the Correctness of Dietary Studies?

Nutritional studies often use the terms reliability, reproducibility and validity to indicate the correctness of the study. These terms do not appear to have a universal meaning to all researchers. The components of a dietary study are the input, the data collection instrument and the compiled data. Frequently the data collection questionnaire/tool/instrument is tested for reliability, reproducibility or validity. The data collection questionnaire/tool/instrument is simply a structure, a vehicle for gathering data. An argument is presented that demonstrates the reasons that such a structure cannot be tested for reliability, reproducibility or validity. The logical approach to the use of the terms reliability, reproducibility and validity is presented. Reliability refers to the input component of the study, reproducibility may or may not lead to strengthening the study and validity refers to the truthfulness of the database generated. Validity must be derived from reliable and reproducible data.

[1]  B. Swinburn,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in European and Polynesian New Zealanders. , 1997, Ethnicity & health.

[2]  G. Beaton,et al.  Day-to-day variation in energy and nutrient intake: Evidence of individuality in eating behaviour? , 1992, Appetite.

[3]  G. Joachim.  Supply and Demand: A Framework for Explaining Variability in Dietary Intake and its Impact on Data , 1997, Nutrition and health.

[4]  A F Subar,et al.  Differences in Reported Food Frequency by Season of Questionnaire Administration: The 1987 National Health Interview Survey , 1994, Epidemiology.

[5]  S. Gimeno,et al.  [Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire]. , 2002, Revista de saude publica.

[6]  G Joachim,et al.  The Relationship Between Habits of Food Consumption and Reported Reactions to Food in People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Testing the Limits , 1999, Nutrition and health.

[7]  M. Möller,et al.  Questionnaire about Calcium Intake: Can We Trust the Answers? , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  Laura A. Talbot,et al.  Principles and Practice of Nursing Research , 1995 .

[9]  N. M. Downie,et al.  Descriptive and Inferential Statistics , 2019, Companion Encyclopedia of Psychology.

[10]  Nancy Fugate Woods,et al.  Nursing Research: Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[11]  Walter C. Willett,et al.  Reproducibility and Validity of Food-Frequency Questionnaires , 1998 .

[12]  G. Joachim.  Sources of Variability in the Reproducibility of Food Frequency Questionnaires , 1998, Nutrition and health.

[13]  B. Liebman.  The changing American diet , 1997 .

[14]  R. L. Rizek,et al.  Dietary intake methodology I. USDA surveys and supporting research. , 1990, The Journal of nutrition.

[15]  Walter C. Willett,et al.  Nature of Variation in Diet , 1998 .

[16]  P. Swan,et al.  Assessment of Lifetime Patterns of Dairy Food Intake and Physical Activity , 1997, Nutrition and health.

[17]  C. Nagata,et al.  Validation of simplified diet history questionnaire. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology.

[18]  G. Beaton,et al.  Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology. , 1994, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[19]  G. Beaton,et al.  The nature and individuality of within-subject variation in energy intake. , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.