Angular displacement perception modulated by force background

We had recumbent subjects (n = 7) indicate the amplitude of imposed, passive yaw–axis body rotations in the 0, 1, and 1.8 g background force levels generated during parabolic flight maneuvers. The blindfolded subject, restrained in a cradle, aligned a gravity-neutral pointer with the subjective vertical while in an initial position and then tried to keep it aligned with the same external direction during a body rotation, lasting less than 1.5 s about the z-axis 30°, 60°, or 120° in amplitude. All the rotations were above semicircular threshold levels for eliciting perception of angular displacement under terrestrial test conditions. In 1 and 1.8 g test conditions, subjects were able to indicate both the subjective vertical and the amplitude of the body rotation reasonably accurately. By contrast in 0 g, when indicating the subjective vertical, they aligned the pointer with the body midline and kept it nearly aligned with their midline during the subsequent body tilts. They also reported feeling supine throughout the 0 g test periods. The attenuation of apparent self-displacement in 0 g is discussed in terms of (1) a possible failure of integration of semicircular canal velocity signals, (2) a contribution of somatosensory pressure and contact cues, and (3) gravicentric versus body-centric reference frames. The significance of the findings for predicting and preventing motion sickness and disorientation in orbital space flight and in rotating artificial gravity environments is discussed.

[1]  W. Becker,et al.  Estimation of self-turning in the dark: comparison between active and passive rotation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Taube,et al.  Degradation of Head Direction Cell Activity during Inverted Locomotion , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  G M Jones,et al.  Vestibular-contingent voluntary saccades based on cognitive estimates of remembered vestibular information. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[4]  F E Guedry,et al.  Use of triangular waveforms of angular velocity in the study of vestibulbar function. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  B. Segal,et al.  Adaptive modification of vestibularly perceived rotation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Simone B. Bortolami,et al.  Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  T. Mergner,et al.  The role of canal-neck interaction for the perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[9]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  The dynamics of parabolic flight: flight characteristics and passenger percepts. , 2008, Acta astronautica.

[10]  Beritov Is.  Spatial projection of objects perceived in the external environment by means of labyrinthine receptors , 1957 .

[11]  Fred W. Mast,et al.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Ashton Graybiel,et al.  Head Movements Elicit Motion Sickness during Exposure to Microgravity and Macrogravity Acceleration Levels1 , 1985 .

[13]  J R Lackner,et al.  The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to sudden stop stimulation. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Charles M Oman,et al.  Rat head direction cell responses in zero-gravity parabolic flight. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  B. J. Yates,et al.  Does the vestibular system contribute to head direction cell activity in the rat? , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  E. Rolls,et al.  Head direction cells in the primate pre‐subiculum , 1999, Hippocampus.

[17]  J. Taube,et al.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  The effect of angular acceleration on sound localization; the audiogyral illusion. , 1949, The Journal of psychology.

[19]  J. Taube.  Head direction cells recorded in the anterior thalamic nuclei of freely moving rats , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Three-dimensional spatial selectivity of hippocampal neurons during space flight , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Jones,et al.  Adaptive plasticity in the gaze stabilizing synergy of slow and saccadic eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  J. Taube.  Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  Oculogravic illusion. , 1952, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Ma Gresty,et al.  Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium , 1986 .

[27]  J. R. Lackner,et al.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  B. Hess,et al.  Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys. II. Otolith-controlled transformation that depends on an intact cerebellar nodulus. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  S Glasauer.  Interaction of Semicircular Canals and Otoliths in the Processing Structure of the Subjective Zenith , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. I. Niven,et al.  On predictive equations for subjective judgments of vertical and horizon in a force field. , 1968, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Experiment M131. Human vestibular function , 1973 .

[32]  H. Mittelstaedt,et al.  Homing by path integration in a mammal , 1980, Naturwissenschaften.

[33]  M. Gresty,et al.  Self‐Controlled Reorienting Movements in Response to Rotational Displacements in Normal Subjects and Patients with Labyrinthine Disease , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[34]  C. R. Gordon,et al.  Adaptive plasticity in the control of locomotor trajectory , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J R Lackner,et al.  The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to Coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[36]  F. Hlavacka,et al.  Multisensory Control of Posture , 1995, Springer US.

[37]  F. Guedry,et al.  Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not? , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[38]  L. Nadel,et al.  Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[39]  W. P. Medendorp,et al.  Canal and Otolith Contributions to Visual Orientation Constancy During Sinusoidal Roll Rotation , 2005 .

[40]  J R Lackner,et al.  Perceived self-motion elicited by postrotary head tilts in a varying gravitoinertial force background , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Hendrik A. H. C. van Veen,et al.  Touch down: The effect of artificial touch cues on orientation in microgravity , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  J. R. Lackner,et al.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  J. Lackner,et al.  Inertial Coriolis Force Perturbations of Arm and Head Movements Reveal Common, Non-Vestibular Mechanisms , 1995 .

[44]  B. J. Yates,et al.  Polysynaptic pathways from the vestibular nuclei to the lateral mammillary nucleus of the rat: substrates for vestibular input to head direction cells , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.