Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.

Programming of multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) requires subjective responses to a series of sophisticated psychophysical percepts. It is often difficult for young prelinguistically deaf children to provide adequate responses for device fitting. This is especially true in setting levels of maximum comfortable loudness, whereby failure to indicate growth of loudness may result in elevation of stimulus levels to the threshold of pain. The acoustic or stapedial muscle reflex has been used previously to provide objective confirmation of acoustic stimulation, and there have been attempts to use the reflex in hearing aid fitting. It has also been suggested that electrically elicited middle ear muscle reflexes (eMEMR) may have applicability in confirming and quantifying electrical stimulation through a CI. To assess the relationship between eMEMR characteristics and levels of loudness perception with CIs, determine reliability of the response, and investigate potential use of eMEMR in CI programming, 25 postlinguistically deafened adult CI users were evaluated. Reflexes have also been attempted on 40 children, with responses present in 31 (71%). Comfort levels predicted by eMEMR were highly correlated with those obtained through subjective judgments in the adult subjects. The eMEMR provides an objective, accurate, and rapid method of estimating maximum comfortable loudness levels, which may be useful in the initial programming of young implant recipients.

[1]  S C Parisier,et al.  Programming the cochlear implant based on electrical acoustic reflex thresholds: Patient performance , 1994, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  A. Beiter,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[3]  R A Ruth,et al.  Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users. , 1994, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  J. Shallop,et al.  Prediction of Behavioral Threshold and Comfort Values for Nucleus 22-Channel Implant Patients from Electrical Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Results , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  P R Kileny,et al.  Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[6]  R. Battmer,et al.  Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[7]  J. Shallop Objective Electrophysiological Measures from Cochlear Implant Patients , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[8]  J. Jerger,et al.  Stapedius Reflex to Electrical Stimulation in a Patient with a Cochlear Implant , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  J. Jerger,et al.  Prediction of dynamic range from stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[10]  P. Chute,et al.  The Relationship Between Electrical Acoustic Reflex Thresholds and Behavioral Comfort Levels in Children and Adult Cochlear Implant Patients , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Intraoperative and Postoperative Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Users: Implications for the Fitting Process , 1994, Ear and hearing.