The education of attention as explanation of variability of practice effects: learning the final approach phase in a flight simulator.

The present study reports two experiments in which a total of 20 participants without prior flight experience practiced the final approach phase in a fixed-base simulator. All participants received self-controlled concurrent feedback during 180 practice trials. Experiment 1 shows that participants learn more quickly under variable practice conditions than under constant practice conditions. This finding is attributed to the education of attention to the more useful informational variables: Variability of practice reduces the usefulness of initially used informational variables, which leads to a quicker change in variable use, and hence to a larger improvement in performance. In the practice phase of Experiment 2 variability was selectively applied to some experimental factors but not to others. Participants tended to converge toward the variables that were useful in the specific conditions that they encountered during practice. This indicates that an explanation for variability of practice effects in terms of the education of attention is a useful alternative to traditional explanations based on the notion of the generalized motor program and to explanations based on the notions of noise and local minima.

[1]  L Tremblay,et al.  Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[2]  David M. Jacobs,et al.  An Empirical Illustration and Formalization of the Theory of Direct Learning: The Muscle-Based Perception of Kinetic Properties , 2009 .

[3]  Claire F Michaels,et al.  Information space is action space: perceiving the partial lengths of rods rotated on an axle , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[5]  K M Newell,et al.  Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. , 2009, Human movement science.

[6]  M T Turvey,et al.  Effects of intention and learning on attention to information in dynamic touch , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[7]  W. Schöllhorn,et al.  Does noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories , 2006 .

[8]  C. Dugas,et al.  On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training , 1987 .

[9]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[10]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Feedback: Does it Enhance Learning Because Performers Get Feedback When They Need It? , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  L. Proteau Chapter 4 On The Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control , 1992 .

[12]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[13]  Charles I. Abramson,et al.  Landing Flare Accident Reports and Pilot Perception Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  G Lintern,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Horizons for Simulated Landing Approaches , 1991, Human factors.

[15]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[16]  Randall W Gibb,et al.  Visual spatial disorientation: revisiting the black hole illusion. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  An Analysis of Slant for Guidance of Landing Approaches , 2000 .

[18]  John M. Flach,et al.  Low Altitude Flight , 1995 .

[19]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Self-Controlled Concurrent Feedback Facilitates the Learning of the Final Approach Phase in a Fixed-Base Flight Simulator , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[20]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Desmond M. Connolly Aviation visual perception: research, misperception and mishaps , 2011 .

[22]  H W Mertens,et al.  Effect of different runway sizes on pilot performance during simulated night landing approaches. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[23]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Direct Learning , 2007 .

[24]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems , 1995 .

[25]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Learning to visually perceive the relative mass of colliding balls in globally and locally constrained task ecologies. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Visual Misperception in Aviation: Glide Path Performance in a Black Hole Environment , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[27]  R Stalnikowicz-Darvasi,et al.  Gastrointestinal bleeding during low-dose aspirin administration for prevention of arterial occlusive events. A critical analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[28]  Wolfgang I,et al.  Applications of Systems Dynamic Principles to Technique and Strength Training , 2003 .

[29]  C. Michaels,et al.  An Information Space for Partial Length Perception in Dynamic Touch , 2011 .

[30]  J. V. Rossum SCHMIDT'S SCHEMA THEORY: THE EMPIRICAL BASE OF THE VARIABILITY OF PRACTICE HYPOTHESIS , 1990 .

[31]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention towards perceptual invariants. , 2009, Human movement science.

[32]  C. Michaels,et al.  Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Mertens Hw Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches , 1981 .

[34]  J M Flach,et al.  Perception and control of altitude: splay and depression angles. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C. Shea,et al.  Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  A. Kirlik Brunswikian Resources for Event-Perception Research , 2009, Perception.

[37]  Stephen Palmisano,et al.  Effects of scenery, lighting, glideslope, and experience on timing the landing flare. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[38]  H W Mertens,et al.  Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[39]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[40]  Jon S. Berndt,et al.  JSBSim: An Open Source Flight Dynamics Model in C++ , 2004 .

[41]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The ecological approach to perception , 1977 .

[42]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Learning to control collisions: the role of perceptual attunement and action boundaries. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Paul Beckett,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Glide-Slope Perception in the Visual Approach to Landing , 1998 .

[44]  Andrew C. Beall,et al.  Optic Flow and Visual Analysis of the Base-to-Final Turn , 1997 .

[45]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  On Potential-Based and Direct Movements in Information Spaces , 2011 .

[46]  L Proteau,et al.  A Sensorimotor Basis for Motor Learning: Evidence Indicating Specificity of Practice , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[47]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Scene Content and Runway Breadth Effects on Simulated Landing Approaches , 1991 .

[48]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Direct learning in dynamic touch. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Boisot,et al.  Information Space , 1995 .

[50]  A. Noē Direct Perception , 2022 .