Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex

In predictive coding theory, the brain is conceptualized as a prediction machine that constantly constructs and updates expectations of the sensory environment [1]. In the context of this theory, Bell et al.[2] recently studied the effect of the probability of task-relevant stimuli on the activity of macaque inferior temporal (IT) neurons and observed a reduced population response to expected faces in face-selective neurons. They concluded that "IT neurons encode long-term, latent probabilistic information about stimulus occurrence", supporting predictive coding. They manipulated expectation by the frequency of face versus fruit stimuli in blocks of trials. With such a design, stimulus repetition is confounded with expectation. As previous studies showed that IT neurons decrease their response with repetition [3], such adaptation (or repetition suppression), instead of expectation suppression as assumed by the authors, could explain their effects. The authors attempted to control for this alternative interpretation with a multiple regression approach. Here we show by using simulation that adaptation can still masquerade as expectation effects reported in [2]. Further, the results from the regression model used for most analyses cannot be trusted, because the model is not uniquely defined.

[1]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses , 2016, Cortex.

[2]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[3]  Ian J. Russell,et al.  Humming in Tune: Sex and Species Recognition by Mosquitoes on the Wing , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Male motion coordination in anopheline mating swarms , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Mosquito bioacoustics: Auditory processing in Culex pipiens pipiens L. Males (Diptera, Culicidae) during flight simulation , 2012, Entomological Review.

[7]  Robert Mill Stimulus-Specific Adaptation, Models , 2014, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience.

[8]  Daniel Robert,et al.  Quantitative analysis of harmonic convergence in mosquito auditory interactions , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2016, Current Biology.

[10]  N. Ouellette,et al.  Empirical questions for collective-behaviour modelling , 2015 .

[11]  D. Robert,et al.  Time-frequency composition of mosquito flight tones obtained using Hilbert spectral analysis. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Membrane Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Adaptation in Cat Area 17In Vivo , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Todorović,et al.  Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Wade G Regehr,et al.  Short-term forms of presynaptic plasticity , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  B. J. Arthur,et al.  Harmonic Convergence in the Love Songs of the Dengue Vector Mosquito , 2009, Science.