Pansharpening Methods Based on ARSIS Concept

Pan-sharpening aims to use image fusion techniques in the remote sensing field in order to synthesis the Multispectral (MS) images to higher resolution using spatial information of the Panchromatic (Pan) image. Up to now, several definitions for the image fusion have been suggested. Wald’s definition (Wald, 1999) is one of these most celebrated definitions used commonly in the remote sensing community which defines image fusion as: ”a formal framework in which are expressed means and tools for the alliance of data originating from different sources. It aims at obtaining information of a greater quality, although the exact definition of ‘greater quality’ will depend on the application”. Many applications such as feature detection, change monitoring, urban analysis, and land cover classification recieve benefits of pan-sharpening. In fact, these applications need both high spectral and spatial resolution concurrently. Due to physical and technological constraints, creating a sensor which can provide high spectral and spatial resolution simultanously is not possible. So, the image fusion algorithms have been received increasingly attention to fuse MS and Pan images and to provide a new image including both spatial charachteristics of Pan and spectral charachteristics of MS images. Usually the pan-sharpening methods are categorized into three main sets (Wald, 2002; Thomas et al., 2008);projection substitution, relative spectral contribution, and methods that belong to the Amelioration de la Resolution Spatiale par Injection de Structures (ARSIS) concept. The Projection–Substitution methods take advantage of a vectorial algorithm. In this kind of methods, all fused images corresponding to different MS images are synthesized simultaneously. These methods consider coincident pixels of MS images as spectral axes. Then, the spectral axes are projected into a new space to reduce the information redundancy. It results the decorrelated components. The structures of MS images, which are mainly related to color, are isolated by one of these components from the rest of the information. Actually these methods assume that the structures contained in this structural component are equivalent to those in the Pan image. Next, this structural component is replaced either partially or wholly with corresponding parts of Pan. Eventually, the inverse projection is performed to obtain the MS images in higher resolution, i.e. the fused images. The most famous methods of this category are those based on principal component analysis (PCA) (Ehlers, 1991; Chavez et al., 1991) and intensity hue saturation (IHS) (Haydn et al., 1982). The Relative Spectral Contribution methods are also based on the linear combination of bands. The basic assumption of these methods is considering the low-resolution Pan as a

[1]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images : The ARSIS concept and its implementation , 2000 .

[2]  Rafael García,et al.  Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[4]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Some terms of reference in data fusion , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Synthesis of Multispectral Images to High Spatial Resolution: A Critical Review of Fusion Methods Based on Remote Sensing Physics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Color enhancement of highly correlated images. II. Channel ratio and “chromaticity” transformation techniques , 1987 .

[7]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  Image fusion—the ARSIS concept and some successful implementation schemes , 2003 .

[8]  W. Shi,et al.  Wavelet-based image fusion and quality assessment , 2005 .

[9]  S. Sides,et al.  Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic , 1991 .

[10]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[11]  I. Pippi,et al.  Quality assessment of decision-driven pyramid-based fusion of high resolution multispectral with panchromatic image data , 2001, IEEE/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas (Cat. No.01EX482).

[12]  D. Yocky Multiresolution wavelet decomposition image merger of landsat thematic mapper and SPOT panchromatic data , 1996 .

[13]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multisensor image fusion techniques in remote sensing , 1991 .

[14]  Roger L. King,et al.  An Efficient Pan-Sharpening Method via a Combined Adaptive PCA Approach and Contourlets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Mehran Yazdi,et al.  A Novel Image Fusion Method Using Curvelet Transform Based on Linear Dependency Test , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Digital Image Processing.

[16]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[17]  E. Candès,et al.  Curvelets: A Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges , 2000 .

[18]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Data Fusion. Definitions and Architectures - Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolutions , 2002 .

[19]  Mehran Yazdi,et al.  Remote sensing image fusion using Gramian as a rule of fusion , 2011 .

[20]  Lucien Wald,et al.  A MTF-Based Distance for the Assessment of Geometrical Quality of Fused Products , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[21]  J. E. Bare,et al.  Application of the IHS color transform to the processing of multisensor data and image enhancement , 1982 .

[22]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Indusion: Fusion of Multispectral and Panchromatic Images Using the Induction Scaling Technique , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[23]  Andrea Garzelli,et al.  Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multiresolution analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Nicolas H. Younan,et al.  Quality analysis of pansharpened images , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[25]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.