Group activity with Paro in nursing homes: systematic investigation of behaviors in participants

ABSTRACT Background: A variety of group activities is promoted for nursing home (NH) residents with dementia with the aim to reduce apathy and to increase engagement and social interaction. Investigating behaviors related to these outcomes could produce insights into how the activities work. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate behaviors seen in people with dementia during group activity with the seal robot Paro, differences in behaviors related to severity of dementia, and to explore changes in behaviors. Methods: Thirty participants from five NHs formed groups of five to six participants at each NH. Group sessions with Paro lasted for 30 minutes twice a week during 12 weeks of intervention. Video recordings were conducted in the second and tenth week. An ethogram, containing 18 accurately defined and described behaviors, mapped the participants’ behaviors. Duration of behaviors, such as “Observing Paro,” “Conversation with Paro on the lap,” “Smile/laughter toward other participants,” were converted to percentage of total session time and analyzed statistically. Results: “Observing Paro” was observed more often in participants with mild to moderate dementia (p = 0.019), while the variable “Observing other things” occurred more in the group of severe dementia (p = 0.042). “Smile/laughter toward other participants” showed an increase (p = 0.011), and “Conversations with Paro on the lap” showed a decrease (p = 0.014) during the intervention period. Conclusions: Participants with severe dementia seemed to have difficulty in maintaining attention toward Paro during the group session. In the group as a whole, Paro seemed to be a mediator for increased social interactions and created engagement.

[1]  B. R. Hasselkus Occupation and well-being in dementia: the experience of day-care staff. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  Patrizia Marti,et al.  Interpretative Dynamics in Human Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[3]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  Situated Analysis of Interactions between Cognitively Impaired Older Adults and the Therapeutic Robot PARO , 2013, ICSR.

[4]  Gianluca Baio,et al.  Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in dementia: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. , 2014, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[5]  D. Feil-Seifer,et al.  Defining socially assistive robotics , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[6]  P. Rabins,et al.  Research on treating neuropsychiatric symptoms of advanced dementia with non-pharmacological strategies, 1998–2008: a systematic literature review , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[7]  E. Williams,et al.  Dog visitation therapy in dementia care: a literature review. , 2008, Nursing Older People.

[8]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Comparison of Verbal and Emotional Responses of Elderly People with Mild/Moderate Dementia and Those with Severe Dementia in Responses to Seal Robot, PARO , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[9]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  M. Egan,et al.  Dementia and Occupation: A Review of the Literature , 2006, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[11]  Jacquie Rand,et al.  Dog‐assisted therapy for older people with dementia: A review , 2008, Australasian journal on ageing.

[12]  B. MacDonald,et al.  The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[13]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robotic therapy at an elderly institution using a therapeutic robot , 2004 .

[14]  D. De Ronchi,et al.  Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: a review. , 2013, Journal of psychiatric research.

[15]  P. Marti,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics in the Treatment of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[16]  E. Mordoch,et al.  Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. , 2013, Maturitas.

[17]  G. Selbæk,et al.  [How many have dementia in Norway?]. , 2014, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[18]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Physiological effects of a companion robot on blood pressure of older people in residential care facility: A pilot study , 2015, Australasian journal on ageing.

[19]  Alfonso Troisi,et al.  Ethological research in clinical psychiatry: the study of nonverbal behavior during interviews , 1999, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  C. Ihlebæk,et al.  Effects on Symptoms of Agitation and Depression in Persons With Dementia Participating in Robot-Assisted Activity: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[21]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[22]  Kerstin Eder,et al.  Towards the safety of human-in-the-loop robotics: Challenges and opportunities for safety assurance of robotic co-workers' , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[23]  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield,et al.  Engagement in persons with dementia: the concept and its measurement. , 2009, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[24]  T. Partonen,et al.  Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO , 2014 .

[25]  K. Uvnäs‐Moberg,et al.  OXYTOCIN MAY MEDIATE THE BENEFITS OF POSITIVE SOCIAL INTERACTION AND EMOTIONS 1 The purpose of this paper is to describe the neuroendocrine mechanisms of positive social interactions. 1 , 1998, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[26]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Quantitative analysis of utterance of elderly people in long-term robot assisted activity , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[27]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[28]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Group sessions with Paro in a nursing home: Structure, observations and interviews , 2016, Australasian journal on ageing.

[29]  Barbara Klein,et al.  Emotional Robotics in Elder Care - A Comparison of Findings in the UK and Germany , 2012, ICSR.