Mapping global and local coevolution across 600 species to identify novel homologous recombination repair genes

The homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway repairs DNA double-strand breaks in an error-free manner. Mutations in HRR genes can result in increased mutation rate and genomic rearrangements, and are associated with numerous genetic disorders and cancer. Despite intensive research, the HRR pathway is not yet fully mapped. Phylogenetic profiling analysis, which detects functional linkage between genes using coevolution, is a powerful approach to identify factors in many pathways. Nevertheless, phylogenetic profiling has limited predictive power when analyzing pathways with complex evolutionary dynamics such as the HRR. To map novel HRR genes systematically, we developed clade phylogenetic profiling (CladePP). CladePP detects local coevolution across hundreds of genomes and points to the evolutionary scale (e.g., mammals, vertebrates, animals, plants) at which coevolution occurred. We found that multiscale coevolution analysis is significantly more biologically relevant and sensitive to detect gene function. By using CladePP, we identified dozens of unrecognized genes that coevolved with the HRR pathway, either globally across all eukaryotes or locally in different clades. We validated eight genes in functional biological assays to have a role in DNA repair at both the cellular and organismal levels. These genes are expected to play a role in the HRR pathway and might lead to a better understanding of missing heredity in HRR-associated cancers (e.g., heredity breast and ovarian cancer). Our platform presents an innovative approach to predict gene function, identify novel factors related to different diseases and pathways, and characterize gene evolution.

[1]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  UV-Protection Timer Controls Linkage between Stress and Pigmentation Skin Protection Systems , 2018, Molecular cell.

[2]  Y. Tabach,et al.  Mutated MITF-E87R in Melanoma Enhances Tumor Progression via S100A4. , 2018, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[3]  Y. Tabach,et al.  Schlafen2 mutation in mice causes an osteopetrotic phenotype due to a decrease in the number of osteoclast progenitors , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Y. Tabach,et al.  SHLD2/FAM35A co‐operates with REV7 to coordinate DNA double‐strand break repair pathway choice , 2018, The EMBO journal.

[5]  C. K. Schmidt,et al.  SAMHD1 Sheds Moonlight on DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[6]  E. Lander,et al.  A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[7]  A. Antoni,et al.  Moonlighting at replication forks – a new life for homologous recombination proteins BRCA1, BRCA2 and RAD51 , 2017, FEBS letters.

[8]  Yanbin Zhang,et al.  Maintenance of genome stability by Fanconi anemia proteins , 2017, Cell & Bioscience.

[9]  O. Mazina,et al.  Reappearance from Obscurity: Mammalian Rad52 in Homologous Recombination , 2016, Genes.

[10]  F. Nielsen,et al.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes in confined pathways , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  David C. Jones,et al.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Ben-Ari FuchsShani,et al.  GeneAnalytics: An Integrative Gene Set Analysis Tool for Next Generation Sequencing, RNAseq and Microarray Data , 2016 .

[13]  Doron Lancet,et al.  GeneAnalytics: An Integrative Gene Set Analysis Tool for Next Generation Sequencing, RNAseq and Microarray Data , 2016, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[14]  L. Hartmann,et al.  The Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Daniel R. Zerbino,et al.  Ensembl 2016 , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Dan M. Bolser,et al.  Ensembl Genomes 2016: more genomes, more complexity , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  E. Sonnhammer,et al.  A genome-wide IR-induced RAD51 foci RNAi screen identifies CDC73 involved in chromatin remodeling for DNA repair , 2015, Cell Discovery.

[18]  Liang Zhao,et al.  FDA Approval Summary: Olaparib Monotherapy in Patients with Deleterious Germline BRCA-Mutated Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Three or More Lines of Chemotherapy , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  Fei Ji,et al.  PhyloGene server for identification and visualization of co-evolving proteins using normalized phylogenetic profiles , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Davide Heller,et al.  STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  J. Gautier,et al.  DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer. , 2014, DNA repair.

[22]  H. Walden,et al.  The Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway: structural and functional insights into a complex disorder. , 2014, Annual review of biophysics.

[23]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  Schraga Schwartz,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping Reveals a Conserved, Widespread, Dynamic mRNA Methylation Program in Yeast Meiosis , 2013, Cell.

[26]  Gary Ruvkun,et al.  Human disease locus discovery and mapping to molecular pathways through phylogenetic profiling , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[28]  Adam P. Rosebrock,et al.  A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[29]  M. Tijsterman,et al.  COM-1 Promotes Homologous Recombination during Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by Antagonizing Ku-Mediated Non-Homologous End Joining , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[30]  Or Zuk,et al.  Identification of small RNA pathway genes using patterns of phylogenetic conservation and divergence , 2012, Nature.

[31]  Harrison W. Gabel,et al.  Small RNA pathway genes identified by patterns of phylogenetic conservation and divergence , 2012, Nature.

[32]  S. Boulton,et al.  Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[33]  M. E. Hodges,et al.  The evolution of land plant cilia. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[34]  H. Lieberman,et al.  Contributions of Rad9 to tumorigenesis , 2012, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[35]  G. Iliakis,et al.  Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways. , 2011, Mutation research.

[36]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  A Genome-Scale DNA Repair RNAi Screen Identifies SPG48 as a Novel Gene Associated with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia , 2010, PLoS biology.

[37]  B. Wollnik,et al.  A homozygous RAB3GAP2 mutation causes Warburg Micro syndrome , 2010, Human Genetics.

[38]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  How the fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome. , 2009, Annual review of genetics.

[39]  J. Bartek,et al.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.

[40]  R. Wollman,et al.  A genome-wide siRNA screen reveals diverse cellular processes and pathways that mediate genome stability. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[41]  R. Kanaar,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent processing of DNA lesions controls localization of Rad9 to sites of genotoxic stress , 2009, Cell cycle.

[42]  A. Ashworth,et al.  A high-throughput RNA interference screen for DNA repair determinants of PARP inhibitor sensitivity. , 2008, DNA repair.

[43]  S. Carr,et al.  A Mitochondrial Protein Compendium Elucidates Complex I Disease Biology , 2008, Cell.

[44]  P. Sung,et al.  Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  Zhen-ran Jiang Protein Function Predictions Based on the Phylogenetic Profile Method , 2008 .

[46]  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer,et al.  Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance , 2008, Cell Research.

[47]  Sara L. Zimmer,et al.  The Chlamydomonas Genome Reveals the Evolution of Key Animal and Plant Functions , 2007, Science.

[48]  Robert J. D. Reid,et al.  The Smc5–Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[49]  B. A. Ballif,et al.  ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage , 2007, Science.

[50]  Peter S. Linsley,et al.  Small Interfering RNA Screens Reveal Enhanced Cisplatin Cytotoxicity in Tumor Cells Having both BRCA Network and TP53 Disruptions , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[51]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: Evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Shankar Subramaniam,et al.  Locally defined protein phylogenetic profiles reveal previously missed protein interactions and functional relationships , 2005, Proteins.

[53]  Penny A. Jeggo,et al.  The role of double-strand break repair — insights from human genetics , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Refined phylogenetic profiles method for predicting protein-protein interactions , 2005, Bioinform..

[55]  Jean-Michel Claverie,et al.  Phydbac2: improved inference of gene function using interactive phylogenomic profiling and chromosomal location analysis , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[56]  Shankar Subramaniam,et al.  Decoding Cilia Function Defining Specialized Genes Required for Compartmentalized Cilia Biogenesis , 2004, Cell.

[57]  J. Eisen,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis and gene functional predictions: phylogenomics in action. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[58]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Localizing proteins in the cell from their phylogenetic profiles. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.