Neural Network Combination by Fuzzy Integral for Robust Change Detection in Remotely Sensed Imagery

Combining multiple neural networks has been used to improve the decision accuracy in many application fields including pattern recognition and classification. In this paper, we investigate the potential of this approach for land cover change detection. In a first step, we perform many experiments in order to find the optimal individual networks in terms of architecture and training rule. In the second step, different neural network change detectors are combined using a method based on the notion of fuzzy integral. This method combines objective evidences in the form of network outputs, with subjective measures of their performances. Various forms of the fuzzy integral, which are, namely, Choquet integral, Sugeno integral, and two extensions of Sugeno integral with ordered weighted averaging operators, are implemented. Experimental analysis using error matrices and Kappa analysis showed that the fuzzy integral outperforms individual networks and constitutes an appropriate strategy to increase the accuracy of change detection.

[1]  Hassiba Nemmour,et al.  Kalman filtering as a multilayer perceptron training algorithm for detecting changes in remotely sensed imagery , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[2]  Xiaolong Dai,et al.  Development of a new automated land cover change detection system from remotely sensed imagery based on artificial neural networks , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[3]  Hassiba Nemmour,et al.  Comparison between object- and pixel-level approaches for change detection in multispectral images by using neural networks , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[4]  D. Civco,et al.  A COMPARISON OF LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGE DETECTION METHODS , 2002 .

[5]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Fusion of neural networks with fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm , 2002, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[6]  Antanas Verikas,et al.  Soft combination of neural classifiers: A comparative study , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Combining multiple neural networks by fuzzy integral for robust classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Change-vector analysis in multitemporal space: a tool to detect and categorize land-cover change pro , 1994 .

[9]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Fuzzy aggregation of modular neural networks with ordered weighted averaging operators , 1995, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  James M. Keller,et al.  Dynamic image sequence analysis using fuzzy measures , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[11]  W. B. Yates,et al.  Classification of remotely sensed data by an artificial neural network: issues related to training data characteristics , 1995 .

[12]  Nazif Tepedelenlioglu,et al.  A fast new algorithm for training feedforward neural networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  G. Banon,et al.  Distinction between several subsets of fuzzy measures , 1981 .

[15]  R. Congalton Accuracy assessment and validation of remotely sensed and other spatial information , 2001 .