EHS subjects do not perceive RF EMF emitted from smart phones better than non-EHS subjects

As the use of smart phones increases, social concerns have arisen concerning the possible effects of radio frequency-electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) emitted from wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) mobile phones on human health. The number of people with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who complain of various subjective symptoms, such as headache, insomnia, etc., has also recently increased. However, it is unclear whether EHS subjects can detect RF-EMFs exposure or not. In this double-blind study, two volunteer groups of 17 EHS and 20 non-EHS subjects were investigated in regards to their perception of RF-EMFs with real and sham exposure sessions. Experiments were conducted using a WCDMA module inside a dummy phone with an average power of 24 dBm at 1950 MHz and a specific absorption rate of 1.57 W/kg using a dummy headphone for 32 min. In conclusion, there was no indication that EHS subjects perceive RF-EMFs better than non-EHS subjects.

[1]  A. Faraone,et al.  Comparisons of computed mobile phone induced SAR in the SAM phantom to that in anatomically correct models of the human head , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  Raymond Neutra,et al.  Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  K. Nam,et al.  Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  Ki Chang Nam,et al.  Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study. , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  Matti Laine,et al.  Pulsed and continuous wave mobile phone exposure over left versus right hemisphere: Effects on human cognitive function , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Christoph Schierz,et al.  Project NEMESIS: Perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment) , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  Kanako Wake,et al.  Effects of short‐term W‐CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  Canada.,et al.  Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fi elds , 2011 .

[9]  L. Hillert,et al.  Investigation of electric current perception thresholds of different EHS groups , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[10]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  Norbert Leitgeb,et al.  Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  Gernot Schmid,et al.  No effect of an UMTS mobile phone‐like electromagnetic field of 1.97 GHz on human attention and reaction time , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  M. Koivisto,et al.  Perception of the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  Maila Hietanen,et al.  Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: No causal link , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  R J Croft,et al.  Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on human alpha rhythms: Resting EEG in adolescents, young adults, and the elderly , 2010, Bioelectromagnetics.

[16]  Lena Hillert,et al.  Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.