Future changes in peak river flows across northern Eurasia as inferred from an ensemble of regional climate projections under the IPCC RCP8.5 scenario

Climate change simulation based on 30-member ensemble of Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory RCM (resolution 25 km) for northern Eurasia is used to drive hydrological model CaMa-Flood. Using this modeling framework, we evaluate the uncertainties in the future projection of the peak river discharge and flood hazard by 2050–2059 relative to 1990–1999 under IPCC RCP8.5 scenario. Large ensemble size, along with reasonably high modeling resolution, allows one to efficiently sample natural climate variability and increase our ability to predict future changes in the hydrological extremes. It has been shown that the annual maximum river discharge can almost double by the mid-XXI century in the outlets of major Siberian rivers. In the western regions, there is a weak signal in the river discharge and flood hazard, hardly discernible above climate variability. Annual maximum flood area is projected to increase across Siberia mostly by 2–5% relative to the baseline period. A contribution of natural climate variability at different temporal scales to the uncertainty of ensemble prediction is discussed. The analysis shows that there expected considerable changes in the extreme river discharge probability at locations of the key hydropower facilities. This suggests that the extensive impact studies are required to develop recommendations for maintaining regional energy security.

[1]  Hayley J. Fowler,et al.  Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling , 2007 .

[2]  N. Arnell,et al.  The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale , 2013 .

[3]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[4]  H. Fowler,et al.  Using regional climate model data to simulate historical and future river flows in northwest England , 2007 .

[5]  René Laprise,et al.  Implementation of a large‐scale variable velocity river flow routing algorithm in the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) , 2003 .

[6]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[7]  E. Wood,et al.  Representation of Terrestrial Hydrology and Large-Scale Drought of the Continental United States from the North American Regional Reanalysis , 2012 .

[8]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global flood risk under climate change , 2013 .

[9]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble , 2013, Climatic Change.

[10]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Introduction to special section : Regional climate modeling revisited , 1999 .

[11]  Response of the atmosphere at high and middle latitudes to the reduction of sea ice area and the rise of sea surface temperature , 2014, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology.

[12]  I M Shkolnik,et al.  Snow cover and permafrost evolution in Siberia as simulated by the MGO regional climate model in the 20th and 21st centuries , 2010 .

[13]  René Laprise,et al.  Reconstruction of the Spring 2011 Richelieu River Flood by Two Regional Climate Models and a Hydrological Model , 2015 .

[14]  Aaron Boone,et al.  Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions , 2011 .

[15]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Flood-initiating catchment conditions: a spatio-temporal analysis of large-scale soil moisture patterns in the Elbe River basin , 2012 .

[16]  Elizabeth C. Kent,et al.  Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century , 2003 .

[17]  Douglas L. Kane,et al.  Changes in Lena River streamflow hydrology: Human impacts versus natural variations , 2003 .

[18]  L. Brocca,et al.  Potential of soil moisture observations in flood modelling : estimating initial conditions and correcting rainfall , 2014 .

[19]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[20]  L. Feyen,et al.  Flood hazard in Europe in an ensemble of regional climate scenarios , 2009 .

[21]  C. Raible.  On the relation between extremes of midlatitude cyclones and the atmospheric circulation using ERA40 , 2007 .

[22]  A. Erler,et al.  Dynamically Downscaled High-Resolution Hydroclimate Projections for Western Canada , 2015 .

[23]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[24]  Peter Krahe,et al.  The Elbe river flooding 2002 as seen by an extended regional climate model , 2012 .

[25]  Kevin Hindle,et al.  The Benefit , 2007 .

[26]  B. Rockel,et al.  A regional climate model hindcast for Siberia: analysis of snow water equivalent , 2013 .

[27]  H. Wernli,et al.  Quantifying the Relevance of Cyclones for Precipitation Extremes , 2012 .

[28]  Ralf Ludwig,et al.  On the need for bias correction in regional climate scenarios to assess climate change impacts on river runoff , 2012 .

[29]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global assessment of agreement among streamflow projections using CMIP5 model outputs , 2014 .

[30]  V. Meleshko,et al.  Changes in climate extremes on the territory of Siberia by the middle of the 21st century: An ensemble forecast based on the MGO regional climate model , 2012, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology.

[31]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[32]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[33]  L. Feyen,et al.  On the benefit of high-resolution climate simulations in impact studies of hydrological extremes , 2009 .

[34]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections , 2013 .

[35]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Development of a high resolution grid-based river flow model for use with regional climate model output , 2007 .

[36]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Temporal and spatial variations in maximum river discharge from a new Russian data set , 2007 .

[37]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Adjustment of a spaceborne DEM for use in floodplain hydrodynamic modeling , 2012 .

[38]  A. V. Vecchia,et al.  Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate , 2005, Nature.

[39]  Douglas L. Kane,et al.  Streamflow changes over Siberian Yenisei River Basin , 2004 .

[40]  David P. Rowell,et al.  Robustness of Future Changes in Local Precipitation Extremes , 2008 .

[41]  Yury Motovilov,et al.  Disastrous flood of 2013 in the Amur basin: Genesis, recurrence assessment, simulation results , 2014, Water Resources.

[42]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[43]  O. Anisimov,et al.  Comparison of model-produced active layer fields : Results for northern Alaska , 2007 .

[44]  E. Todini,et al.  A rainfall–runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model , 1992 .

[45]  Clive Anderson,et al.  Estimating Changing Extremes Using Empirical Ranking Methods , 2002 .

[46]  Daqing Yang,et al.  Discharge Characteristics and Changes over the Ob River Watershed in Siberia , 2004 .

[47]  R. Rudari,et al.  Identification and ranking of extraordinary rainfall events over Northwest Italy: The role of Atlantic moisture , 2013 .