What is minimal about predictive inferences?

Pronunciation of a probe word that relates to a highly predictable event is typically facilitated when the probe immediately follows the target sentence, but not when it is delayed until after a second sentence. These findings suggest that inferences about highly predictable events are minimally drawn during reading. Using a similar paradigm, in which the probe was delayed, we found significant priming in a reading condition that encouraged focus on the referential state of affairs (situation level) expressed in the sentences. In contrast, significant priming forpredictive texts was not observed in a reading condition that encouraged focus on the text per se (text level). These results are interpreted within a theoretical model that assumes that predictive inferences are represented at a situational level only, whereas explicitly presented information is represented at several levels (text and situational). It is in this sense that predictive inferences may be said to be minimally represented.

[1]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences: From Activation to Long-Term Memory. , 1999 .

[2]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences in Narrative Text , 1993 .

[3]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .

[4]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[5]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[6]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[7]  M. Singer,et al.  Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. , 1992 .

[8]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[10]  J. Barclay.  The role of comprehension in remembering sentences , 1973 .

[11]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Levels of representation in memory for discourse. , 1994 .

[12]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The time course and durability of predictive inferences , 1993 .

[13]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[15]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[17]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[18]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[19]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .

[20]  M. Gardner,et al.  USING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.