Machine Learning-Based Node Characterization for Smart Grid Demand Response Flexibility Assessment

As energy distribution systems evolve from a traditional hierarchical load structure towards distributed smart grids, flexibility is increasingly investigated as both a key measure and core challenge of grid balancing. This paper contributes to the theoretical framework for quantifying network flexibility potential by introducing a machine learning based node characterization. In particular, artificial neural networks are considered for classification of historic demand data from several network substations. Performance of the resulting classifiers is evaluated with respect to clustering analysis and parameter space of the models considered, while the bootstrapping based statistical evaluation is reported in terms of mean confusion matrices. The resulting meta-models of individual nodes can be further utilized on a network level to mitigate the difficulties associated with identifying, implementing and actuating many small sources of energy flexibility, compared to the few large ones traditionally acknowledged.

[1]  Kang-Kun Lee,et al.  A method to improve the stability and accuracy of ANN- and SVM-based time series models for long-term groundwater level predictions , 2016, Computational Geosciences.

[2]  Ebrahim Ghaderpour,et al.  LSWAVE: a MATLAB software for the least-squares wavelet and cross-wavelet analyses , 2019, GPS Solutions.

[3]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  A Survey on Microgrid Energy Management Considering Flexible Energy Sources , 2019, Energies.

[4]  Norihiko Shinomiya,et al.  Distributed control based on tie-set graph theory for smart grid networks , 2010, International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems.

[5]  Song Deng,et al.  Information Security Risk Propagation Model Based on the SEIR Infectious Disease Model for Smart Grid , 2019, Inf..

[6]  Michael H. Neumann,et al.  Bootstrapping Neural Networks , 2000, Neural Computation.

[7]  Marcus M. Keane,et al.  A standardised flexibility assessment methodology for demand response , 2019, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation.

[8]  R. Murawski,et al.  Comprehensive Real-Time Simulation of the Smart Grid , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[9]  Otto Plasek,et al.  Neural Network-Based Train Identification in Railway Switches and Crossings Using Accelerometer Data , 2020 .

[10]  T. Warren Liao,et al.  Clustering of time series data - a survey , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Energy meters evolution in smart grids: A review , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Jiří Apeltauer,et al.  Train Type Identification at S&C , 2020 .

[13]  George Deodatis,et al.  Identification of critical samples of stochastic processes towards feasible structural reliability applications , 2014 .

[14]  Considerations Regarding the Negative Prices on the Electricity Market , 2020, Proceedings.

[15]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  Short-Term Electric Load and Price Forecasting Using Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine Optimization in Smart Grids , 2019, Energies.

[16]  Germain Forestier,et al.  Deep learning for time series classification: a review , 2018, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[17]  Aleksis Xenophon,et al.  Open grid model of Australia’s National Electricity Market allowing backtesting against historic data , 2018, Scientific Data.

[18]  Bin Li,et al.  A Two-Stage Household Electricity Demand Estimation Approach Based on Edge Deep Sparse Coding , 2019, Inf..

[19]  P. Hansen,et al.  Agent-Based Model of a Blockchain Enabled Peer-to-Peer Energy Market: Application for a Neighborhood Trial in Perth, Australia , 2020, Smart Cities.

[20]  Vladimir Tulsky,et al.  Investigation of Voltage Control at Consumers Connection Points Based on Smart Approach , 2016, Inf..

[21]  Stefano Riverso,et al.  Flexibility Analysis for Smart Grid Demand Response , 2017, ArXiv.