The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon

Five experiments are reported comparing memory for words that were generated by the subjects themselves with the same words when they were simply presented to be read. In all cases, performance in the generate condition was superior to that in the read condition. This held for measures of cued and uncued recognition, free and cued recall, and confidence ratings. The phenomenon persisted across variations in encoding rules, timed or selfpaced presentation, presence or absence of test information, and between- or within-subjects designs. The effect was specific to the response items under recognition testing but not under cued recall. A number of potential explanatory principles are considered, and their difficulties enumerated. It is concluded that the generation effect is real and that it poses an interesting interpretative problem. This is an empirically oriented article whose purpose is to report a set of simple experiments that establish the existence of a robust and interesting phenomenon of memory. This phenomenon, called the generation effect, is robust in that it manifests itself across a variety of testing procedures, encoding rules, and other situational changes. It is interesting in that it does not seem to be easily or satisfactoril y accommodated by any of the currently familiar explanatory notions. We expect that once the phenomenon is described in its initial form, it will be the subject of wider experimental analysis and will eventually become better understood. In contrast to the usual objective reasons for embarking upon a line of research, the present work was neither initiated by any extant theoretical issue nor inspired by any previously published findings. It was carried out with the sole purpose of arriving at a

[1]  B. Underwood,et al.  Meaningfulness and verbal learning , 1960 .

[2]  E. Tulving INTRATRIAL AND INTERTRIAL RETENTION: NOTES TOWARDS A THEORY OF FREE RECALL VERBAL LEARNING. , 1964, Psychological review.

[3]  N. J. Slamecka Differentiation versus unlearning of verbal associations. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. Abra Acquisition and retention of consistent associative responses with varied meaningfulness and similarity of stimuli , 1968 .

[5]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[6]  Samuel A. Bobrow,et al.  COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF SENTENCES , 1969 .

[7]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Meaningful processing of sentences. , 1971 .

[8]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Effects of Prior Free Recall Testing on Final Recall and Recognition. , 1971 .

[9]  R. H. Hopkins,et al.  Pronunciation effects in recognition memory , 1972 .

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[11]  G. Davies,et al.  On the Significance of “Double Encoding” for the Superior Recall of Pictures to Names , 1973 .

[12]  Fraser A. Bleasdale,et al.  Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Identical subject-generated and experimenter-supplied mediators in paired-associate learning , 1974 .

[14]  R. Lockhart The Facilitation of Recognition by Recall. , 1975 .

[15]  F. Bellezza,et al.  Long-term memory for speaker’s voice and source location , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[16]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Memory for internally generated stimuli. , 1976 .

[17]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Reprocessing as a recognition cue , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[18]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[19]  E. Tulving Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. , 1976 .

[20]  H. Buschke,et al.  Hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli: The growth of recall for an internally generated memory list abstracted from a series of riddles , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Fact and fantasy: The effects of internally generated events on the apparent frequency of externally generated events , 1977, Memory & cognition.