INTRODUCTION
In the rural Midwest region of Western Australia (WA), wound care is a major burden on the healthcare system. Optimal wound care was found to be impeded by issues that included the involvement of multiple healthcare providers, incomplete and inconsistent documentation, and limited access to expert review. A telehealth solution was trailed in 2007.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the systemic barriers encountered in implementing a telehealth program in rural WA and to provide recommendations for future telehealth initiatives.
METHODS
This study trialled the use of a shared electronic wound imaging and reporting system in combination with an expert remote wound consultation service for the management of patients with chronic wounds in the Midwest of WA. The trial sites included rural hospital out-patient clinics, a private domiciliary nursing service, residential aged care facilities, general practices and a podiatry clinic. The implementation conformed to accepted best practice in introducing telehealth initiatives.
RESULTS
During the trial 12 sites had the relevant software installed and were able to access a central server. Although a total of 41 patients with chronic wounds were enrolled, four sites did not enroll any patients and only two sites successfully incorporated the system into regular practice. Major obstacles were workforce issues and significant delays in installing the software at some sites. Only 47% of the healthcare providers trained to use the software at the beginning of the trial were still employed when the trial ended. Prolonged periods of vacant positions at one remote clinic and an aged care facility made it impossible for the remaining providers to allocate time for using the wound care software.
CONCLUSION
The disease burden of the patient group, funding models and workforce shortages frustrated the successful adoption of an evidence based strategy that was known to improve health outcomes.
[1]
Deborah Helitzer,et al.
Telehealth in the trenches: reporting back from the frontlines in rural America.
,
2004,
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.
[2]
Pamela Whitten,et al.
Success and failure: a case study of two rural telemedicine projects
,
2003,
Journal of telemedicine and telecare.
[3]
N. Santamaria,et al.
The effectiveness of digital imaging and remote expert wound consultation on healing rates in chronic lower leg ulcers in the Kimberley region of Western Australia
,
2004
.
[4]
E. Krupinski.
Telemedicine consultations: Failed cases and floundering specialties
,
2004,
Journal of telemedicine and telecare.
[5]
E. Mauldon.
The Use of and Attitude Towards Telehealth in Rural Communities
,
2007
.
[6]
Peter M Yellowlees,et al.
Successfully developing a telemedicine system.
,
2005,
Journal of telemedicine and telecare.
[7]
Paul Wallace,et al.
Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation.
,
2003,
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.
[8]
R. Scott,et al.
Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of telehealth: a case study from Canada.
,
2004,
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.
[9]
Stacey L Cole,et al.
Rural outreach in home telehealth: assessing challenges and reviewing successes.
,
2006,
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.