Mapping between transmission constraint penalty factor and OPF solution in electricity markets: analysis and fast calculation

Abstract -- In electricity markets, transmission constraint relaxation is frequently used to ensure the feasibility of the optimal power flow (OPF) problem and avoid the expensive yet ineffective congestion adjustment. However, transmission constraint penalty factors have a considerable impact on the market scheduling and prices. There is still no consensus on how to properly set the penalty factors. In this paper, the impact of transmission constraint penalty factors on the market solution is quantitatively investigated via the sensitivity analysis of the DC OPF model. Parametric programming is performed to determine the change of the market scheduling and prices with respect to the change of penalty factors. In particular, we prove for the very first time that when the objective function of the market model is quadratic, the parametric programming can be conveniently performed without the need of re-optimizing the DC OPF model in most cases. On this basis, an efficient method is proposed for exactly characterizing the mapping between the penalty factors and the market solution. Case studies show that the proposed method could be up to 100 times quicker than re-optimizing the DC OPF model as in the traditional parametric programming process.

[1]  Yong Wang,et al.  Risk management and participation planning of electric vehicles in smart grids for demand response , 2016 .

[2]  L. Tesfatsion,et al.  Locational marginal pricing basics for restructured wholesale power markets , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[3]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Fundamental Review of the OPF Problem: Challenges, Solutions, and State-of-the-Art Algorithms , 2018 .

[4]  Haiwang Zhong,et al.  A General Formulation of Linear Power Flow Models: Basic Theory and Error Analysis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Solving OPF using linear approximations: fundamental analysis and numerical demonstration , 2017 .

[6]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  LMP Revisited: A Linear Model for the Loss-Embedded LMP , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  J. Ramos,et al.  State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow , 2011 .

[8]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Impacts of Constraint Relaxations on Power System Operational Security , 2016, IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal.

[9]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Analyzing the Impacts of Constraint Relaxation Practices in Electric Energy Markets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  S. Surender Reddy,et al.  Optimal power flow using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm , 2019, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[11]  Roman Mendelevitch,et al.  A spatial electricity market model for the power system: The Kazakhstan case study , 2018 .

[12]  J. Maciejowski,et al.  Soft constraints and exact penalty functions in model predictive control , 2000 .

[13]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  Offline penalty price determination method for transmission thermal constraint relaxations , 2018 .

[14]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Risk-Based Locational Marginal Pricing and Congestion Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Desta Z. Fitiwi,et al.  Finding a representative network losses model for large-scale transmission expansion planning with renewable energy sources , 2016 .

[17]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  A Linearized OPF Model With Reactive Power and Voltage Magnitude: A Pathway to Improve the MW-Only DC OPF , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Exact Penalty Function Based Constraint Relaxation Method for Optimal Power Flow Considering Wind Generation Uncertainty , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  S. Surender Reddy Emergency reserve activation considering demand-side resources and battery storage in a hybrid power system , 2018 .

[20]  Tongxin Zheng,et al.  Marginal loss modeling in LMP calculation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  P. R. Bijwe,et al.  Differential evolution-based efficient multi-objective optimal power flow , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[22]  Mehdi Ehsan,et al.  Equilibria in the competitive retail electricity market considering uncertainty and risk management , 2016 .

[23]  S. Surender Reddy,et al.  An efficient optimal power flow using bisection method , 2018 .