Innovative efforts of ISO 9001-certified manufacturing firms: Evidence of links between determinants of innovation, continuous innovation and firm performance

The innovation efforts of manufacturing firms have recently come to top the agendas of both businesses and industrial policy makers. One persistent research gap in this field relates to testing the relationship between continuous innovation (CI) and firm performance, while taking into account the role of three determinants of firms’ level of innovation as core drivers in manufacturing firms working under ISO 9001 certification. Anchored in the resource-based view theory (RBV), we shed light on these relationships using an original sample of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Our research results provide several implications for ISO 9001-certified manufacturers: (i) evidence of a positive relationship between innovation policy (IP) and CI, whereby IP fosters CI; (ii) evidence of the important role of innovation strategies (INS) in relation to CI; (iii) evidence of a positive relationship between CI and firm performance, whereby CI improves both innovation and financial performance. The implications of our findings for both theory and end-users are presented, with a particular focus on emerging economies, such as Indonesia, a country which has been under-studied in the state-of-the-art literature on operations management.

[1]  T. Cheng,et al.  First to market: Is technological innovation in new product development profitable in health care industries? , 2010 .

[2]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama,et al.  Basics of structural equation modeling , 1997 .

[3]  Beate Klingenberg,et al.  The relationship of operational innovation and financial performance—A critical perspective , 2013 .

[4]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research , 2008 .

[5]  Ana B. Escrig-Tena,et al.  The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[6]  Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia,et al.  The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies , 2016 .

[7]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  Assessing output performance of information technology service industries: Productivity, innovation and catch-up , 2016 .

[8]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A Multi-method Approach , 2017 .

[9]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis , 2004 .

[10]  D. Prajogo The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance , 2016 .

[11]  C. Edquist,et al.  The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments , 2013, Holistic Innovation Policy.

[12]  Evan Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. , 2018, The American psychologist.

[13]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[14]  M. Černe,et al.  Management innovation enters the game: Re-considering the link between technological innovation and financial performance , 2015 .

[15]  Xin Zhai,et al.  Deploying human capital for innovation: A study of multi-country manufacturing firms , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[16]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  Kamel Jedidi,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Methodology for Treating Heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[18]  S. Sotoca,et al.  Innovation and business survival: A long-term approach , 2018, Research Policy.

[19]  Cyril R. H. Foropon,et al.  When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[20]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness , 2016 .

[21]  R. Groves Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[22]  D. Bandalos Measurement Theory and Applications for the Social Sciences , 2018 .

[23]  Goo Hyeok Chung,et al.  Implementing innovations within organizations: a systematic review and research agenda , 2017 .

[24]  Jose Luis Beltran Guerrero,et al.  ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance , 2014 .

[25]  Jayanth Jayaram,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms , 2014 .

[26]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[27]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia , 1996 .

[28]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[29]  Shashi,et al.  The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[30]  Fang-I. Kuo,et al.  Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance , 2016 .

[31]  J. Aubert Rwanda’s innovation challenges and policies – lessons for Africa , 2018 .

[32]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[33]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures , 2019, Internet Res..

[34]  Miika Varis,et al.  Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs , 2010 .

[35]  Sverker Alänge,et al.  A corporate system for continuous innovation: the case of Google Inc. , 2013 .

[36]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture , 2011 .

[37]  Bennet A. Zelner,et al.  Does innovation policy attract international competition? Evidence from energy storage , 2017 .

[38]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Scientific progress in measurement theory? , 2013 .

[39]  U. Lichtenthaler Toward an innovation-based perspective on company performance , 2016 .

[40]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[41]  Younès El Manzani,et al.  Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory , 2019, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[42]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective , 2002 .

[43]  François Coallier,et al.  The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: A survey of the Brazilian furniture industry , 2016 .

[44]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The impacts of information technology on total factor productivity: A look at externalities and innovations , 2014 .

[45]  Cheng-Feng Cheng,et al.  Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees’ job satisfaction: A mathematical model and empirical research , 2010 .

[46]  Marina Apaydin,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010 .

[47]  M. Caridi,et al.  Linking product modularity and innovativeness to supply chain management in the Italian furniture industry , 2012 .

[48]  Yi-Fen Huang,et al.  The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation , 2010 .

[49]  Azam Chaudhry,et al.  Innovation and firm performance in developing countries: The case of Pakistani textile and apparel manufacturers , 2018, Research Policy.

[50]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[51]  T. Soemardi,et al.  Continuous Innovation: A Literature Review and Future Perspective , 2018, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology.

[52]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Measurement for the Social Sciences: The C-OAR-SE Method and Why It Must Replace Psychometrics , 2010 .

[53]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[54]  Tony C. Garrett,et al.  Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[55]  P. Koellinger The Relationship between Technology, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence on E-Business in Europe , 2008 .

[56]  A. Anandarajan,et al.  The Effect of Innovative Activity on Firm Performance: The Experience of Taiwan , 2007 .

[57]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After , 2010 .

[58]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Complementarity of Innovation Policies in the Brazilian Industry: An Econometric Study , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[59]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[60]  Min Zhang,et al.  Effects of absorptive capacity, trust and information systems on product innovation , 2018 .

[61]  Scott J. Grawe,et al.  Non-response bias assessment in logistics survey research: use fewer tests? , 2014 .

[62]  Ping-Kuo Chen,et al.  How can the ISO 9000 QMS improve the organizational innovation of supply chains? , 2019, International Journal of Innovation Science.

[63]  Adegoke Oke,et al.  Innovation Strategy, Human Resource Policy, and Firms' Revenue Growth: The Roles of Environmental Uncertainty and Innovation Performance , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[64]  Nathan S. Hartman,et al.  Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique , 2010 .

[65]  Rifat Kamasak,et al.  Determinants of innovation Performance: A Resource-based Study , 2015 .

[66]  Harry Boer,et al.  Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product, process and organisational innovation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[67]  B. Byrne Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[68]  Hengky Latan,et al.  Chapter 4 PLS Path Modeling in Hospitality and Tourism Research: The Golden Age and Days of Future Past , 2018, Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research.

[69]  Yanyan Gao,et al.  Does Democracy Cause Innovation?An Empirical Test of the Popper Hypothesis , 2017 .

[70]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[71]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany , 2018, Research Policy.

[72]  K. Kilic,et al.  Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance , 2011 .

[73]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[74]  V. Kannan,et al.  Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance: Insights from resource dependence theory , 2017 .

[75]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment , 2010 .

[76]  Jonathan P. Allen Information systems as technological innovation , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[77]  Xiaobo Wu,et al.  Technology embeddedness, innovation differentiation strategies and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[78]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations , 2017 .

[79]  Hongyi Sun,et al.  The impact of technological innovation on product quality: the moderating role of firm size , 2018 .

[80]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance , 2004 .

[81]  Kalanit Efrat The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation , 2014 .

[82]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[83]  Barbara Bigliardi,et al.  The effect of innovation on financial performance: A research study involving SMEs , 2012 .

[84]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003 , 2006 .

[85]  César Camisón,et al.  Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance , 2014 .

[86]  Harry Boer,et al.  Knowledge and continuous innovation: The CIMA methodology , 2001 .

[87]  Gregory P. Prastacos,et al.  The Resource Based View of the Firm and Innovation: Identification of Critical Linkages , 2003 .

[88]  José Alcides Gobbo Junior,et al.  Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation , 2018, Technovation.

[89]  Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani,et al.  Examining the impact of design for environment and the mediating effect of quality management innovation on firm performance , 2016 .

[90]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Introduction to Psychometric Theory , 2010 .

[91]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad , 2006 .

[92]  V. Costantini,et al.  Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies , 2017 .

[93]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[94]  Pablo Muñoz-Gallego,et al.  Organizational and environmental factors as moderators of the relationship between multidimensional innovation and performance , 2012 .

[95]  E. James Flynn,et al.  INNOVATION HISTORY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS. , 1995 .

[96]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[97]  Shu Han,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[98]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Multivariate Analysis with LISREL , 2016 .

[99]  Juan Vicente García Manjón,et al.  Innovation systems and policy design: The European experience , 2012 .

[100]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Sample Non-response Bias and Aggregate Benefits in Contingent Valuation: an Examination of Early, Late and Non-respondents , 1993 .

[101]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation policy: What, why, and how , 2017 .

[102]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  12 Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis , 2009 .

[103]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .