Self-attribution and telepresence

Anthropomorphically-designed teleoperation systems may result in the phenomenon of telepresence: The experience of being there at the remote site. Yet, there is another aspect to the phenomenon of telepresence, which has received relatively little attention: Self-identification with the slave robot. In this paper, we aim to further explicate the relationship between self-identification (or self-attribution) and telepresence. For this purpose, we will review recent studies that have used the experimental paradigm of the rubber-hand illusion. In this illusion, people attribute a fake hand to themselves; feeling as if it is actually part of their own bodies. We will discuss the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms behind the brain's remarkable capability to incorporate external objects as phenomenological extensions of the self, and discuss how research on (tele)presence and body-representations can benefit from each other.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness , 2006 .

[2]  M. Botvinick.  Probing the Neural Basis of Body Ownership , 2004, Science.

[3]  R. Dolan,et al.  Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  The Mind's I Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul /Composed and Arranged by Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett. --. -- , 1981 .

[5]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Telepresence , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[6]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Human Body Perception From The Inside Out , 2005 .

[7]  K. Spenner,et al.  Skill , 1990, Does Skill Make Us Human?.

[8]  Peter J. Werkhoven,et al.  Visuomotor Adaptation to Virtual Hand Position in Interactive Virtual Environments , 1998, Presence.

[9]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[10]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Where was I. , 1940 .

[12]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Body Schema and Intentionality , 1995 .

[13]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: Where Are We? , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Erik Myin,et al.  Skill, corporality and alerting capacity in an account of sensory consciousness. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[17]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of phantom limbs , 1998 .

[18]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  Self-recognition: body and action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[20]  W. IJsselsteijn.  Towards a neuropsychological basis of presence , 2005 .

[21]  Charles Spence,et al.  Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Jonathan Cole,et al.  On the immunity principle: a view from a robot , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  R M Müri,et al.  Beyond re-membering: phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Elfed Huw Price.  A critical review of congenital phantom limb cases and a developmental theory for the basis of body image , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[26]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[30]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (2nd ed.) , 1993 .

[31]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[32]  M. Jeannerod.  The mechanism of self-recognition in humans , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  W. IJsselsteijn,et al.  The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. , 2008, Body image.

[34]  R. Melzack.  Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[35]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[36]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[37]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  Effect of Variations in Sensory Feedback on Performance in a Virtual Reaching Task , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[39]  P. Schilder.  The Image and Appearance of the Human Body: Studies in the Constructive Energies of the Psyche , 1936 .

[40]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[42]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Understanding synthetic experience must begin with the analysis of ordinary perceptual experience , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE Research Properties in Virtual Reality Symposium.

[44]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  P. Rochat,et al.  Perceived self in infancy , 2000 .