New insight into technology licensing strategy and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese latecomers in high-tech industries

As a catalyst for endogenous technological change, inward technology licensing can improve firm's innovation performance. This paper investigates the effect of learning by licensing and strategic choice of technology licensed in on subsequent innovation performance. We extend the inward technology licensing strategy to the latecomer context, addressing two critical factors: (1) number of licenses and (2) age of technology licensed in. We hypothesize about the relationship of the licensee's innovation performance with number of licenses and age of technology licensed in, as well as the moderating effect of the licensee's absorptive capability. Based on a sample of 154 Chinese firms from four high-tech industries, empirical evidence is found to support our arguments.

[1]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge‐Based and Information‐Processing Perspective* , 2005 .

[2]  Yueru Wei,et al.  Technology Transfer, Adaptation & Assimilation and Indigenous Invention Patent Output: Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Industries , 2012 .

[3]  C. Shapiro,et al.  How to License Intangible Property , 1986 .

[4]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  The impact of licenses on a “late-starter” LDC: Chile in the 1990s , 2002 .

[5]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks , 2004 .

[6]  Koichi Futagami,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Innovation and International Transfer of Technology through Licensing , 2007 .

[7]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Determinants of Inward Technology Licensing Intentions: An Empirical Analysis of Australian Engineering Firms , 1993 .

[8]  Robert H. Pitkethly.  Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities , 2001 .

[9]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[11]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[13]  John H. Friar,et al.  The Emergence of Technology Strategy: A New Dimension of Strategic Management , 1986 .

[14]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[15]  A. Arora,et al.  The Market for Technology , 2010 .

[16]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[17]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[18]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[19]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[20]  M. Dowling,et al.  Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms , 2004 .

[21]  K. Rockett.  Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing , 1990 .

[22]  A. H. Rubenstein,et al.  An exploration of factors affecting the integration of in-house R&D with external technology acquisition strategies of a firm , 1990 .

[23]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[24]  Daniel K. N. Johnson.  "Learning-by-Licensing": R&D and Technology Licensing in Brazilian Invention , 2002 .

[25]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Combinative capabilities and organizational learning in latecomer firms: the case of the Korean semiconductor industry , 1999 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[27]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[28]  Homi Katrak,et al.  Developing countries' imports of technology, in-house technological capabilities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience , 1997 .