Neutral Landscapes: Bases for Exploration in Landscape Ecology

Neutral landscape models are computer-generated representations of the spatial pattern of habitat. Most are based on a grid of cells, although network (graph theory) representations are increasing. Representation of the landscape varies from binary (habitat – non-habitat) to nearly continuous. The motivations for this approach to the study of landscapes include concepts derived from island biogeography as well as the idea that computer experiments might be substituted for real experiments at such spatial extents. Different spatial patterns can be generated using the three primary algorithms for grid-based neutral landscapes (random, hierarchical, and fractal), while network representations are usually variations on networks derived from observed landscapes. Scale, encompassing both resolution and extent in cellular models as it is in the network models, is an underlying issue that needs to be addressed more explicitly, but it is not a fatal flaw. Numerous applications of neutral landscapes have been developed in assessing actual landscapes, evaluating spatial metrics, and studying landscape connectivity – especially in relation to organism movement or dispersal. Neutral landscapes offer geographers opportunities to pursue spatial questions and to influence questions in landscape ecology.

[1]  Glen D. Johnson,et al.  Multiresolution fragmentation profiles for assessing hierarchically structured landscape patterns , 1999 .

[2]  Scott B. Franklin,et al.  Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. , 2006 .

[3]  A. King,et al.  ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LANDSCAPE HISTORY FOR ASSESSING EXTINCTION RISK , 2005 .

[4]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A prospective longitudinal study of landscape matrix effects on fauna in woodland remnants: experimental design and baseline data , 2001 .

[5]  S. Levin,et al.  Competitive coexistence in a dynamic landscape. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  A Fractal Landscape Realizer for Generating Synthetic Maps , 2002 .

[7]  G. Malanson,et al.  Patterns of Correlation Among Landscape Metrics , 2007 .

[8]  Qian Wang,et al.  Ecological processes and spatial patterns before, during and after simulated deforestation , 2007 .

[9]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  S. Aviron,et al.  When is landscape matrix important for determining animal fluxes between resource patches , 2005 .

[11]  G. Malanson Spatial Representations of Habitat in Competition-Colonization Models , 2002 .

[12]  George P. Malanson,et al.  Dispersal across continuous and binary representations of landscapes , 2003 .

[13]  Alan R. Johnson,et al.  Diffusion in Fractcal Landscapes: Simulations and Experimental Studies of Tenebrionid Beetle Movements , 1992 .

[14]  G. Valladares,et al.  Plant species richness in the Chaco Serrano Woodland from central Argentina : Ecological traits and habitat fragmentation effects , 2006 .

[15]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[16]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I: The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation , 1983 .

[17]  R. Feagin,et al.  Edge effects in lacunarity analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Sarah E. Gergel,et al.  Spatial and non-spatial factors: When do they affect landscape indicators of watershed loading? , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments , 1997 .

[20]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Geography and Computational Science , 2000 .

[21]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  G. Malanson,et al.  Landscape heterogeneity, connectivity, and critical landscapes for conservation , 1999 .

[23]  C. Loehle,et al.  Effects of parcelization and land divestiture on forest sustainability in simulated forest landscapes , 2006 .

[24]  D. Saupe Algorithms for random fractals , 1988 .

[25]  S. Levin,et al.  The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Are rainforests self-organized in a critical state? , 1995 .

[27]  Susan L. Graham,et al.  The high-performance computing continuum , 1998, CACM.

[28]  Cinda Davis,et al.  MOVEMENT RESPONSES TO PATCH STRUCTURE IN EXPERIMENTAL FRACTAL LANDSCAPES , 1999 .

[29]  T. Ricketts The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[30]  L. Tischendorf Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  T. Keitt Spectral representation of neutral landscapes , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  E. Jules,et al.  A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: Why matrix habitat is more important than we thought , 2003 .

[33]  Anthony W. King,et al.  The Implications of Metalandscape Connectivity for Population Viabilityin Migratory Songbirds , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Critical Thresholds in Species' Responses to Landscape Structure , 1995 .

[35]  George R. Parker,et al.  Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Hong S. He,et al.  Simulating private land ownership fragmentation in the Missouri Ozarks, USA , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  A. King,et al.  Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes , 1999 .

[39]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[40]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes , 1987, Science.

[41]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment , 1987 .

[42]  B. Økland UNLOGGED FORESTS: IMPORTANT SITES FOR PRESERVING THE DIVERSITY OF MYCETOPHILIDS (Diptera." Sciaroidea) , 1996 .

[43]  D. Debinski Forest fragmentation and matrix effects: the matrix does matter , 2006 .

[44]  G. Malanson,et al.  The fractal shape of riparian forest patches , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  Simone K. Heinz,et al.  Connectivity in Heterogeneous Landscapes: Analyzing the Effect of Topography , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[47]  Katherine A. Eschelbach,et al.  Comparing the potential effectiveness of conservation planning approaches in central North Carolina, USA , 2006 .

[48]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Dispersal of annual plants in hierarchically structured landscapes , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[50]  M. Palmer,et al.  The Coexistence of Species in Fractal Landscapes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapes , 1993 .

[52]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  I. Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  Yuehui Li,et al.  The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[55]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  Graphs and generalized tracks: quantifying Croizat's panbiogeography , 1987 .

[56]  Alain Franc,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics as a contact process on a graph , 2004 .

[57]  Richard T. T. Forman,et al.  Landscape graphs: Ecological modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[58]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[59]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A Network Approach for Analyzing Spatially Structured Populations in Fragmented Landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[60]  A. King,et al.  The effect of landscape structure on community self-organization and critical biodiversity , 2004 .

[61]  E. Renshaw,et al.  The description of spatial pattern using two-dimensional spectral analysis , 1984, Vegetatio.

[62]  A. King,et al.  Demographic Limitations of the Ability of Habitat Restoration to Rescue Declining Populations , 2005 .

[63]  W. Garrison CONNECTIVITY OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM , 2005 .

[64]  M. Turner Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? , 2005 .

[65]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  BIRD ASSEMBLAGES IN PATCHY WOODLANDS: MODELING THE EFFECTS OF EDGE AND MATRIX HABITATS , 1997 .

[66]  Machida,et al.  Quantum magnetic oscillations and rapid oscillation phenomena in (TMTSF)2X (X=ClO4 and NO3). , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[67]  S. As Are habitat islands islands? Woodliving beetles (Coleoptera) in deciduous forest fragments in boreal forest , 1993 .

[68]  Hong S. He,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of neutral landscape models to represent a real landscape , 2004 .

[69]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[70]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Quantifying scale-dependent effects of animal movement with simple percolation models , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[71]  Sari C. Saunders,et al.  Identifying scales of pattern in ecological data: a comparison of lacunarity, spectral and wavelet analyses , 2005 .

[72]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Using Neutral Models to Identify Constraints on Low-severity Fire Regimes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[73]  J. Franklin Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[74]  G. Malanson,et al.  Ants in Labyrinths: Lessons for Critical Landscapes , 1999 .

[75]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[76]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  A Spatial Patch Dynamic Modeling Approach to Pattern and Process in an Annual Grassland , 1994 .

[77]  K. Freemark,et al.  Matrix Matters: Effects of Surrounding Land Uses on Forest Birds Near Ottawa, Canada , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[78]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Neutral Models: Useful Tools for Understanding Landscape Patterns , 1997 .

[79]  M. Andersen,et al.  Risk analysis and management decisions for weed biological control agents: Ecological theory and modeling results , 2005 .

[80]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[81]  J. Wiens,et al.  HOW DOES HABITAT PATCH SIZE AFFECT ANIMAL MOVEMENT? AN EXPERIMENT WITH DARKLING BEETLES , 1999 .

[82]  Jill Lancaster,et al.  Using neutral landscapes to identify patterns of aggregation across resource points , 2006 .

[83]  R. Keane,et al.  Using simulation to map fire regimes: an evaluation of approaches, strategies, and limitations , 2003 .

[84]  Hong S. He,et al.  Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm , 2004 .

[85]  D. Driscoll Is the matrix a sea? Habitat specificity in a naturally fragmented landscape , 2005 .

[86]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process , 2006 .

[87]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[88]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[89]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? , 2002 .

[90]  Ude Shankar,et al.  Scaling properties in landscape patterns: New Zealand experience , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[91]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[92]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A hierarchical neutral model for landscape analysis , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[93]  Agustín Estrada-Peña,et al.  Effects of Habitat Suitability and Landscape Patterns on Tick (Acarina) Metapopulation Processes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[94]  J. Gamarra Metapopulations in multifractal landscapes: on the role of spatial aggregation , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[95]  G. Malanson Extinction-Debt Trajectories and Spatial Patterns of Habitat Destruction , 2002 .

[96]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Analysis of landscape sources and sinks: the effect of spatial pattern on avian demography , 2001 .

[97]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[98]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  Dynamic Modeling, Geostatistics, and Fuzzy Classificaiton: New Sneakers for a New Geography? , 1999 .

[99]  John F. Weishampel,et al.  Quantifying spatial structure of volumetric neutral models , 2005 .

[100]  Maria Tengö,et al.  The value of small size: loss of forest patches and ecological thresholds in southern Madagascar. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[101]  L. Fahrig How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[102]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Spatial Aggregation and Neutral Models in Fractal Landscapes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[103]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .

[104]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  RULE: Map Generation and a Spatial Analysis Program , 1999 .