High-Risk Morphological and Physiological Coronary Disease Attributes as Outcome Markers After Medical Treatment and Revascularization.

[1]  B. Koo,et al.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation , 2021, Korean circulation journal.

[2]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  CT Angiographic and Plaque Predictors of Functionally Significant Coronary Disease and Outcome Using Machine Learning. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  B. Koo,et al.  Influence of Anatomical and Clinical Characteristics on Long-Term Prognosis of FFR-Guided Deferred Coronary Lesions. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  D. Andreini,et al.  Coronary Plaque Features on CTA Can Identify Patients at Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  F. Ye,et al.  Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Percent atheroma volume: Optimal variable to report whole-heart atherosclerotic plaque burden with coronary CTA, the PARADIGM study. , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Differences in Progression to Obstructive Lesions per High-Risk Plaque Features and Plaque Volumes With CCTA. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Relevance of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics of non-obstructive coronary lesions in the prediction of risk for acute coronary syndrome , 2019, European Radiology.

[11]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Consistency of quantitative analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography. , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[12]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Prognostic Value of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Quantification of Coronary Atherosclerosis in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  J. Spertus,et al.  Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document , 2018, European heart journal.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Coronary Atherosclerotic Precursors of Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  G. Rioufol,et al.  Five‐Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Jiyan Chen,et al.  Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease , 2018, European heart journal.

[18]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Effect of Plaque Burden and Morphology on Myocardial Blood Flow and Fractional Flow Reserve. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  T. Maddox,et al.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Taylor M. Duguay,et al.  Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[22]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions , 2016, European heart journal.

[23]  L. Shaw,et al.  Plaque Characterization by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Events in Mid-Term Follow-Up. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[25]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[26]  Evelyn Regar,et al.  In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. , 2014, European heart journal.

[27]  T. Murohara,et al.  Prognostic impact of lipid contents on the target lesion in patients with drug eluting stent implantation , 2013, Heart and Vessels.

[28]  D. Berman,et al.  Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  Additive value of semiautomated quantification of coronary artery disease using cardiac computed tomographic angiography to predict future acute coronary syndrome. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[31]  G. Meyer,et al.  Percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgical backup. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  P. Serruys,et al.  Residual plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndromes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[33]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  L. Keele,et al.  A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis , 2010, Psychological methods.

[36]  Stephen J. Nicholls,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  D. Berman,et al.  Value of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Patients With Normal Resting Electrocardiograms: An Evaluation of Incremental Prognostic Value and Cost-Effectiveness , 2002, Circulation.

[38]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Effects of Statins on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques The PARADIGM ( Progression of AtheRosclerotic PlAque DetermIned by Computed TomoGraphic Angiography Imaging ) Study , 2018 .

[39]  H. Rashid,et al.  Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography–Derived Plaque Characteristics Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[40]  D. Berman,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[41]  Hyun-Jae Kang,et al.  A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.